FORMER first minister Nicola Sturgeon has asked her first question at FMQs since stepping down as SNP leader.
Standing up at Holyrood on Thursday, Sturgeon asked her successor Humza Yousaf to commit to continued funding of family support to ensure the keeping of The Promise.
The former SNP leader requested that the Scottish Government continue to fund the Whole Family Wellbeing Fund (WFWF) in order to meet the commitments of The Promise.
In 2016, during her time as first minister, Sturgeon committed to The Promise.
It seeks to ensure that all children growing up in Scotland are “loved, safe, respected and realise their full potential”.
She also announced an Independent Care Review, which documents problems within Scotland’s care system and suggests how the government can invest in change.
The WFWF seeks to reduce the need to crisis intervention for families by funding local support services to invest in early intervention and prevention.
READ MORE: Campaigners call on Scottish Government to strengthen Land Reform Bill
Under Sturgeon, the Scottish Government committed to £500 million of funding for the WFWF until 2026.
However, the former first minister sought assurances from Yousaf that it would continue under his leadership.
She said: “Does the First Minister agree that to keep the promise the significant progress that has already been made does need to continue and now intensify?
“In particular, does he agree that the Whole Family Wellbeing Fund is absolutely essential to provide the funding to transform services so that families are better supported and fewer young people then need to enter care in the first place.
“And to that end, will he give a commitment that this fund will be delivered in full and that it will be fully invested to improve the lives of the young people present and future to whom that promise has been made.”
Yousaf replied: “First and foremost can I recognise that there frankly would not be a Promise if it wasn’t for the efforts of the former first minister.”
Many MSPs then applauded Yousaf’s praise of Sturgeon.
He continued: “And I think Nicola Sturgeon would be the first to say that there would be no promise if it wasn’t for the efforts of young care experienced people.
“So, I want to pay tribute to them for the impact that they have had on all of us – not just on government but I suspect every single member of the Scottish Parliament who has engaged with care-experienced young people and care-experienced people more generally will have been impacted.
“I have had the pleasure of engaging with a number of care-experienced people in my time as First Minister and before. Most recently hosting them in Bute House for a Christmas party, which was not just great fun but actually gave me the opportunity to hear from them directly on the improvements we had to make.
READ MORE: SNP MP hits out at UK Government's response to journalist deaths in Gaza
“To answer Nicola Sturgeon’s question directly, the whole family wellbeing fund is of course an essential component for us in terms of keeping The Promise.
“And despite the very challenging Autumn Statement, despite the continued cuts over a number of years to our budget, we have prioritised £50 million for the fund in the 2024/25 budget.
“As I said, even in the face of significant financial constraints, reflecting our priority and the importance that we attach to keeping the promise.”
It comes after Sturgeon expressed concerns that her flagship plan to improve the care system were not on track due to “vested interests” pushing back against reforms and called on the SNP to do more.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel