A COUNCIL spent more than £100,000 from budgets including for road services, street lighting and overtime on the “Scottish coronation” for King Charles, the Sunday National can reveal.
The service took place at St Giles’ Cathedral in Edinburgh on July 5, where the monarch was presented with the Honours of Scotland – and heard protests from campaigners.
The bill for the event paid by Edinburgh City Council totalled £106,777, with the local authority confirming the funds were taken from existing budgets.
The overall cost of staging the event was revealed in minutes of the Labour-run council's meetings, and was only referred to as “Operation Sceptre”.
READ MORE: King Charles popularity is monarchy's 'worst in decades'
A breakdown obtained by the Sunday National shows the biggest spend – £93,000 – was by the road service, street lighting, events and environment teams, with £5600 spent on traffic notices and advertising.
Another £3400 was spent on parking enforcement, with £2200 on overtime costs.
Other costs included around £800 on hospitality, £825 on radio hire and install and £640 on a resident and business letter drop.
Anti-monarchy campaigners have branded it a “raid on public coffers” at a time of austerity and a “shocking waste of money” during a cost of living crisis.
The overall bill for the crowning of King Charles on May 6 in London – which was estimated to cost up to £100 million – and for the service at St Giles’ Cathedral has still not been made public.
But the costs have included £47,000 to move the Stone of Destiny from Edinburgh to London, while the Scottish Government picked up the cost of a new £22,000 sword and paid more than £250,000 for commemorative silver medals for police officers (below).
Edinburgh City Council also spent funds set aside for children’s toys and from its school budgets to promote the King’s coronation, The National revealed last year.
Tristan Gray, convener of anti-monarchy campaign group Our Republic, said: “Every time Charles dips his hands into the public purse he makes a mockery of the message that he’s simply delighted to serve.
“He’s a billionaire, more than capable of funding events held in his own honour entirely from his own pocket. But he chooses not to. He chooses to raid public coffers during austerity, because he believes he’s entitled to it.
READ MORE: BBC flooded with complaints of bias over King Charles documentary
“No wonder the public are turning their backs on a man who pillages funding for children’s toys to fund his gold-trimmed ceremonies instead.”
He added: “He didn’t think to ask, and nor did Edinburgh City Council. Maybe whether their councillors will choose to throw money at this royal billionaire will be on the minds of voters at the next council elections.”
Graham Smith, CEO of campaign group Republic, said: “This is a shocking waste of money at a time when the council needs to be providing essential services, at a time when so many are struggling with the cost of living crisis.
“The palace should be covering the full cost of Charles’s vanity parade, and yet as is usually the case, they allow local taxpayers to pick up the bill. I hope the council now sends an invoice to the King.”
Council budgets in Scotland are under strain and three months before the coronation, Edinburgh Council leader Cammy Day said the city had received the “worst grant funding of any local authority in Scotland”.
In November, it was reported he had suggested increasing council tax by 20% to maintain services, prior to First Minister Humza Yousaf announcing a freeze on the tax.
Day said: “As the capital of Scotland, we have certain civic obligations to host events such as Operation Sceptre.
“We attempted to recoup our expenditure from the Scottish Government but unfortunately this wasn’t possible.
"All these costs were met from existing budgets.
"I'd add that the event was a great success and council colleagues and partners once again distinguished themselves, with the eyes of the world firmly on the city."
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “From the outset of planning, it was explained to all parties involved in the delivery of the Service of Thanksgiving and Dedication that no additional funding was available to pass on and costs would have to be met within existing resources.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel