KEIR Starmer has said that he won’t tax the super rich more in order to redistribute to the poorest if prime minister.
The Labour leader was speaking with ITV's deputy political editor Anushka Asthana ahead of a TV profile to be aired later this week.
The journalist - writing in The Guardian – said she read out a quote from Tony Blair, which read: “It’s not a burning ambition for me to make sure that David Beckham earns less money.”
Asked whether he agreed with that, Starmer replied without hesitation: “No.”
When then pressed on whether – if elected as prime minister at the next General Election – he would want to take more money from the super-rich and redistribute it to the poorest, he again responded with “no”, adding: “I don’t disagree with that.”
He went on: “I don’t think redistribution is the sort of one-word answer for millions of people across the country”.
READ MORE: Labour wealth tax U-turn 'disturbing but not surprising', says First Minister
In July last year, Humza Yousaf branded Labour’s wealth tax U-turn as “disturbing but not surprising” after the party’s shadow chancellor insisted there were “no plans” for one - despite previously advocating for it.
Rachel Reeves also ruled out an increase to the top rate of income tax, one of Starmer’s now-infamous “10 pledges” he made during the party’s last leadership election.
Starmer previously vowed to increase the 45p income tax rate for the top 5% of earners, stating that there would be “no stepping back from our core principles”
The move caused a backlash from the left wing of the party, with Momentum writing on X, formerly known as Twitter: “Four people in this country have more wealth than *20 million Britons*.
“Meanwhile, capital gains are taxed lower than income.
“This is a political choice to favour big business & the 1% over ordinary people. Shameful.”
An ex-Labour MP also said at the time that the move showed the party are tailoring their policies to the English middle class and “abandoning everything they’ve ever stood for”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel