A MAJOR cross-party report into the constitutional future of Wales has concluded that independence is a viable option.
The final report of the Independent Commission on the Constitutional Future of Wales was published on Thursday and concluded the status quo and current devolution settlement are “not sustainable”.
It recommends a range of measures to strengthen the current settlement, including the devolution of justice and policing.
But it equally stresses the status quo is unsustainable and that three options – independence, entrenched devolution, and federalism – are viable.
Entrenched devolution would fix and expand the Senedd’s powers and make sure the powers Wales has are protected.
READ MORE: Westminster 'undermined' Scotland's Covid restrictions
The commission was established under the co-operation agreement between Plaid Cymru and the Welsh Government.
It has spent the past two years considering options for reform, in what has been dubbed the biggest national conversation Wales has had about its constitutional future since devolution.
Plaid Cymru leader Rhun ap Iorwerth said the report was “ground-breaking” and called it a “very significant step forward in terms of the constitutional debate in Wales”.
He added steps need to be taken “immediately” to build on the current devolution settlement.
“This is a very significant piece of work and sets the tone for the discussion to come on the constitutional future of Wales and I’m excited about the possibilities that are explored in this ground-breaking report,” he said.
“It is crystal clear that the status quo and the limited devolution we have is not sustainable. Steps need to be taken immediately to build on the current settlement and as a party we will be urging the implementation of the series of recommendations on strengthening Welsh democracy settlement with immediate effect.
“As somebody who has always believed in our ability to take all the levers of change into our hands, to have a report of this stature spelling out unambiguously that independence is a genuine option for us as a means to realise our potential is a very significant step forward in terms of the constitutional debate in Wales.”
READ MORE: 'Misogynistic': Anger as Tory MP calls SNP's Alison Thewliss 'hysterical'
Ap Iorwerth added the report paints a “clear picture” that neither enhanced devolution nor federalism will provide the “long-term answers” Wales needs.
It comes after Ap Iorwerth told The National that the Barnett Formula needed to be scrapped.
He suggested he would like to work with Plaid Cymru’s “sister” party, the SNP, to make funding for devolved nations fairer across the UK through a needs-based model entrenched in legislation.
Made up of representatives from across and beyond all of Wales’ major political parties, the Commission has spent two years considering and delivering options for fundamental reform of constitutional structures in Wales and strengthening Welsh democracy.
In its interim report in December 2022, the Commission – made up of representatives from across and beyond all of Wales’s major political parties – determined that the current devolution settlement is unstable as a result of Brexit, Covid, and the preceding decade of Tory-imposed austerity.
It also determined that there were three realistic options for Wales’ constitutional future – entrenched devolution, federalism and independence.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel