JEREMY Vine appeared to be won over by an incredible pitch for Scottish independence.
The presenter was speaking on his show, Jeremy Vine on 5 on Thursday, when he asked journalist (and The National columnist) Lesley Riddoch whether the Scottish independence dream was dead.
He asked: "Scotland's quest for independence has peaked and it will never go back to where it was in 2014, correct or not?"
Riddoch then clarified that she was pro-independence herself before stating: "No matter what's been happening to the SNP, support for independence is still sitting at 50%, and we're not going away."
READ MORE: Glasgow caller branded 'embarrassment' after shocking call on Jeremy Vine show
She said that may seem "extraordinary" to people, but added: "In the same way that people don't decide after they've lost a General Election, they'll go home and just forget what they intended in the first place, it's not going to change."
Riddoch then praised the Scottish Child Payment, which she said has been described as "the only thing" that has made an impact on child poverty in Europe for the last 40 years.
This argument came from poverty expert Professor Danny Dorling of Oxford University, who spoke highly of the payment in an interview with The National last year.
She went on: "We've not got strikes in the health service at the moment because, what's the point? You've a need to reach a consensus with people. And respect trade unions.
🗣️'It's not going to change'
— The National (@ScotNational) January 19, 2024
Lesley Riddoch appears on Jeremy Vine to explain why the idea of Scottish independence isn't going away - and has the host 'banging on the table' 👇 pic.twitter.com/RFXivvTPjk
"We've not voted Tory except three times in the 1950s, when those governments produced council houses."
The journalist then said Scotland is a "different country".
She said: "We want to be able to get the governments we vote for, that's not going to change."
An enthusiastic Vine then thanked Riddoch, saying it was "food for thought".
As the guests nodded approvingly, he added: "We're all, like, banging the table here."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel