LABOUR have denied it is dropping a pledge to invest £28 billion a year in green projects.
It came after a report that the expenditure commitment was being axed.
The party also failed to mention the commitment in a campaigning brief published earlier this week.
But on Friday evening, a Labour spokesperson said: “We are committed to Labour’s Green Prosperity Plan to drive growth and create jobs, including our plan to ramp up to £28 billion of annual investment in the second half of the parliament, subject to our fiscal rules.”
The Sun had earlier reported that the opposition party was dumping the £28 billion expenditure pledge, while retaining the policy ambition.
The newspaper quoted an unnamed source as saying the figure had “become an albatross around our neck”.
READ MORE: Grangemouth oil refinery's fate sealed as ministers agree to 'support transition'
The Guardian said senior party officials will hold crunch talks on the plan’s fate and could still abandon it if they conclude it will damage the party in an election campaign.
The reports prompted criticism, with SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn saying: “Winning the global race to net zero is essential to securing economic growth, energy security, skilled jobs and inward investment.
“Turning away from delivery, out of fear of being attacked by the worst Tory Government in history, is desperate and dispiriting.”
Labour’s key pitch has come under scrutiny in recent months, with the Tories branding it unaffordable in attacks that have become more frequent since the UK entered an election year.
Sir Keir Starmer has previously hinted he could scale down the investment given the financial picture he would inherit if he becomes prime minister.
But supporters have been concerned about watering it down.
Andy Burnham (above), the Labour mayor for Greater Manchester, last week urged Starmer to “stick to your guns” on the policy to invest in the future.
“This is not spending, this is investment in the future, investment in new industry, investment in better homes for our residents, better transport,” he said.
The Labour leader on Sunday told the BBC that he stood by the policy, but added numerous caveats, saying it was “subject to what the Government has already assigned” for environmental projects and needs to be “within our fiscal rules”.
Labour promised in 2021 to invest £28 billion a year until 2030 in green projects if it came to power.
READ MORE: Gordon Brown slated for pushing 'perverse' Multibank scheme
But last year shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said it would instead be a target to work towards in the second half of a first parliament, if Labour wins an election.
Meanwhile, the Scottish Greens have urged Labour to "come clean" following the reports it was on the verge of dropping the commitment entirely.
The party's climate spokesperson Mark Ruskell said:
“Sir Keir Starmer’s policies have frequently proven to be worth less than the paper they’re written on. One by one they’ve been ripped up, cast aside, and forgotten.
"And that’s before he even gets a sniff of power. But we can’t afford to see more backsliding on climate policy.
“He has already said he would keep the climate-wrecking Rosebank oil field. Rolling back on his £28 billion climate pledge would be a major betrayal of future generations. If he doubles down with this reported U-turn then he would be selling out their future at a time when a shift from fossil fuels to renewables is more urgent than ever.
“Keir Starmer can end the speculation by coming clean about the cuts or, far better, reaffirming his commitment to the climate action that his party has promised."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel