THERE are concerns that Scotland’s incoming temporary rent control measures are “confusing” and may have a “knock-on effect” on tenants.
Earlier this week, the Scottish Government announced measures set to bridge the gap between the rent cap ending on March 31 and full-blown rent controls being introduced through the Housing Bill.
The plans essentially change the rent adjudication process for a year, giving MSPs time to pass the legislation in Holyrood, expected to contain full rent controls.
Tenants can challenge proposed rent increases from landlords with Rent Service Scotland (RSS) or the First-tier Tribunal, with a cap of 12%.
READ MORE: How Scotland's new rent controls system works as freeze comes to an end
However, there are several caveats, complicated equations and tenants' rights campaigners have described the new process as “really confusing”, suggesting it would put people off going through the process.
Following the announcement, the Scottish Association of Landlords (SAL) advised its members that the formula would only apply if tenants challenged any proposed increase.
Aditi Jehangir (below), secretary of Scotland's tenants union Living Rent, told the Sunday National: “I think the more people that are confused, the less likely it is people are going to go through the process of trying to contest a rent increase.
“Because it's tied to market rent - which is so unbelievably high at the moment - that doesn't really help.
“I think tying any sort of rent adjudication measures to [market prices] already feels a bit like a failure.
“I think people are gonna struggle to use it and understand it, and then it just leaves people more vulnerable to exploitation.”
Jehangir added that the union generally recommends against going through the current process of rent adjudication, as it can sometimes lead to higher prices than were initially contested.
We previously reported in 2022 that almost 80% of tenants who challenged their landlords over a rental price hike through RSS were forced to pay more.
Between 2018 and 2022, RSS handled 169 cases where tenants challenged a price hike. Only 34 (20.1%) were successful in keeping their monthly costs the same.
READ MORE: Scottish Tory MSP didn't declare £1m interests before rent cap attack
Following the rent freeze and subsequent cap, private rental prices in Scotland have still soared above inflation.
The monthly cost for one, two, three, and four-bedroom properties all jumped well above the 9% Consumer Price Index (CPI), with properties in Glasgow seeing huge increases of 22.3% (£191 per month).
Out of 18 areas in Scotland analysed, 11 saw prices raised above inflation, according to figures released by the Scottish Government.
With rents in Edinburgh and Glasgow at an average of more than £1000 a month, Jehangir questioned the sustainability of this, and the likely “knock-on effects”.
“That’s really expensive - especially for people with families, people with caring responsibilities - your money doesn't go as far as it used to,” she explained.
“If people are scared of rent increases, they’re probably less likely to chase up repairs and bad conditions, it just means people are effectively trapped in poor housing situations.”
How do landlords feel about the changes?
IT isn’t just tenants who are concerned by the proposed changes, landlords, who have campaigned against the freeze, cap and incoming rent controls, have also described the proposals as “overly complicated”.
John Blackwood, chief executive of the SAL, said: “While the Scottish Government has finally recognised the need and benefits of landlords investing in their properties, their actions and rhetoric to date have already significantly harmed the ability and desire for many to do so.”
Blackwood claimed the rent freeze has “exacerbated Scotland’s housing crisis” and forced many landlords to sell their properties.
READ MORE: Covid Inquiry: Fake Nicola Sturgeon WhatsApp messages go viral
“We agree with tenant groups that what the Scottish Government has announced is overly complicated and will be confusing for both landlords and tenants to understand,” he added.
“We are keen to work with the Scottish Government, social housing and other providers, along with tenants groups, to develop a long-term plan which encourages investment across Scotland’s housing sector, increases supply, and provides people and families with the right kind of choice for a home that suits their needs and budget.”
What does this mean for rent controls?
THE first iteration of the Housing Bill has not yet been laid, so whether rent controls will be tied to market rents has not yet been confirmed.
Tenants' Rights Minister Patrick Harvie (below) insisted the Scottish Government is "committed to long-term rent controls" when the temporary measures were announced.
Jehangir said that tenants' rights campaigners are concerned that bringing in measures without tackling how high rents have risen will not solve the problem, but still have “hope” they could be transformational.
Living Rent has called for rent controls to be affordable, tied to the quality of the property to incentivise repair and other factors such as the energy rating and factoring in tenant’s income.
“It's recommended that you shouldn't pay more than 30% of your income and I think even just analysing that across the country at the moment, everybody's paying over that,” she added.
“It just seems like these measures were brought in through the cost of living crisis and obviously, that can only go on for so long in terms of the legislation, but that cost of living crisis is not going away.”
The Scottish Government has been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel