ANGELA Rayner has claimed she would do “everything I possibly could” to stop the war in Gaza as she was asked if she believed “genocide” was being committed.
The deputy leader of the Labour Party previously abstained when given the chance to vote on the SNP’s Gaza ceasefire motion in November last year.
Despite Labour MPs being ordered to abstain on the amendment, 56 rebelled against Keir Starmer to vote in favour of the motion.
Speaking to Good Morning Britain, Rayner was asked whether she would abstain or vote for a ceasefire if another vote was held today.
Richard Madeley: "Do you think there are aspects of genocide [in Gaza]"
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) January 30, 2024
Angela Rayner: "I don't know"
If you don't know, why have you thrown out a Labour MP who says whats happening is genocide? #GMB pic.twitter.com/SQ1aeqcW4a
“I mean the challenge that’s happening in Gaza. I’m a mother and a grandmother myself and you see the devastation in Gaza is absolutely horrific,” she said.
Pressed on whether or not she would vote for a ceasefire, Rayner added: “We’re very clear. We want to see a situation where Hamas gives the hostages, we still have over 130 hostages, people who were going about their daily business on October 7 slaughtered, murdered and taken from their families.
“Hostages need to be released and we need to see a sustainable ceasefire and we need to have that humanitarian aid getting into Gaza as quickly as possible. There isn’t enough aid getting into Gaza at the moment.”
READ MORE: Covid Inquiry: Michael Gove's secret 'risk to Union' report revealed
Rayner was then asked about the moment she was confronted by pro-Palestine campaigners at a Labour fundraising event.
“I understand that strong feeling. I would do everything I possibly could to stop what’s happening,” she said.
Pressed further on a ceasefire, she added: “Realistically, what we’re trying to do at the moment is bring about a ceasefire, bring about the release of those hostages and bring about a two-state solution for that area.
“I would give everything to make that happen. I’m a mother myself, I’ve been looking at what’s happening in that region for many decades, as a trade unionist, let alone as an MP.”
Susanna Reid "A woman was filmed shouting, 'what kind of feminist are you? 15,000 women & children dead, &you tout yourself a modern day feminist'..."
— Saul Staniforth (@SaulStaniforth) January 30, 2024
Angela Rayner ".. I would do everything I could possibly could to stop whats happening"
Except call for an immediate ceasefire pic.twitter.com/qx7nWLqXtp
Asked why she would not actively vote for a ceasefire, Rayner said Labour were trying to “bring about the situation by diplomacy” and that a vote “was not going to make it happen”.
Asked further what she felt about the use of the word “genocide” to discuss what’s happening in Gaza, Rayner said: “I think the ICJ ruling is very serious and I think it puts the marker down. It was very clear that the humanitarian crisis we see unfolding in Gaza for the Palestinians is really serious.”
READ MORE: MSPs to debate Scotland's future in the European Union
Writing on Twitter/X, the SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn commented: "Sounds like Angela is reading to vote for an immediate ceasefire, no?"
She was then questioned on if she thought there were “aspects of genocide” and replied: “I don’t know. The ICJ is the right place for that to be determined.
“It’s very clear from what we’re seeing, the reports we’re getting. There is nowhere near enough humanitarian aid getting into Palestine.
“We have got to make sure that aid gets to those people.”
Many social media users also took to Twitter/X to criticise Rayner with one describing her responses as a "non-answer" while another hit out at her for not being a "principled politician".
A third user commented: "Easy to say you'd do everything, harder to actually DO something. Abstaining is not leadership."
Many others continued to question her reasons for not voting for a ceasefire while another described her comments as "hypocrisy".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel