ANAS Sarwar has said Covid-bereaved families “don’t want tears” in response to former first minister Nicola Sturgeon holding back tears as she reflected on her handling of the pandemic.
The Scottish Labour leader added that Covid “didn’t just take a heavy impact” on Sturgeon as he responded to the former FM’s appearance at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry in Edinburgh on Wednesday.
Speaking to journalists in Westminster, Sarwar said there was a “sense of betrayal” from those who had admired Sturgeon’s leadership during the pandemic.
But he said that Sturgeon’s testimony would only serve to “further enrage” those who lost loved ones to Covid.
Asked for his response to Sturgeon (above) fighting back tears at the inquiry, Sarwar said: “I’ll take the words of the Covid bereaved. They said they didn’t want tears, they didn’t want an apology, they didn’t want a repetition of the script that we’ve heard now for two years.
“They wanted answers. And I think the answers they did get is only going to further enrage them, rather than give them comfort. I know it took a heavy impact on Nicola Sturgeon, but the pandemic didn’t just take a heavy impact on her.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar called out as Labour back Liz Truss on unlimited bankers' bonuses
“It took a heavy impact on every citizen of our country and it took the heaviest impact on those who lost loved ones, for example the Covid bereaved families.”
Speaking outside the inquiry in Edinburgh, Pamela Thomas of the Scottish Covid Bereaved group said: "Her crocodile tears are not washing with me."
He said there was a sense of “betrayal” after Sturgeon confirmed on Wednesday she had deleted all WhatsApp messages from her phone, despite previously insisting she would hand over all messages to the inquiry.
“They don’t trust the answers they’re getting from the first minister, they think there’s a sense of betrayal, they’ve lost trust and I don’t think they’re the only ones,” he said.
The Scottish Labour leader accepted that the SNP had acted as “better communicators” than the Tories in Westminster, but claimed that “many of the impacts of Covid were worse in Scotland than they were in other parts of the UK”.
He said: “There’s no denying that they were a better communications operation than the UK Government. But a pandemic response is of course partly communication but it’s not the only thing.
READ MORE: SNP fire back at ‘grossly misleading’ Nicola Sturgeon burner phone claims
"And if you look deeper down into the numbers, many of the impacts of Covid were worse in Scotland than they were in other parts of the UK and what happened in our care homes is a perfect example of that.
“There is nobody else to blame for the decision of sending Covid-positive or untested patients into care homes where it had a devastating effect and many people lost their lives as a result.
“And the idea you’re going to talk nicely or present yourself nicely to overcome why that decision was made, I don’t think is credible.”
Hospital patients in both Scotland and England were discharged to care homes without taking Covid tests.
Speaking at the Covid inquiry earlier in the day, Sturgeon rejected claims she saw Covid as an opportunity to push Scottish independence.
She said: "I didn't see an opportunity of any description in Covid. I saw a threat, a risk, a catastrophe."
Sturgeon added: "The idea that in those horrendous days, weeks, I was thinking of a political opportunity, I find, well, it's just, it wasn't true.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel