THE Presiding Officer has issued a response to calls for a Scottish Tory MSP to correct the record over her interests in rental property.
During FMQs last week, Pam Gosal railed against the rent cap during a supplementary question, clashing with First Minister Humza Yousaf.
However, she did not declare prior to this contribution that she had over £1 million in shares in three property letting firms.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon Covid Inquiry: Live updates as former FM gives evidence
The Scottish Tories have insisted that Gosal’s interests are not relevant, as they relate to commercial properties not residential.
Her register of interests has been updated to include a reference to the fact she makes no remuneration from her shares in the firms.
It comes after we revealed Gosal was urged to be “transparent” on her interests in the rental sector.
SNP MSP Claire Haughey raised a point of order in Holyrood on Wednesday afternoon, with concerns that Gosal had not followed “proper procedure”.
“During a supplementary question, Pam Gosal made a number of claims regarding the rent cap implemented under the Cost of Living Tenant Protection Act 2022,” Haughey told the chamber.
“She failed, however, to declare her interest in shares over one million pounds in three letting companies as listed in the member’s register of interests.
“Presiding Officer it is vital that the public who view business in this chamber or who consult the official report are fully informed of potential conflicts of interest, particularly during a meeting as closely followed as First Minister's Questions.”
Haughey told MSPs that she had waited a day to allow Gosal to the record before raising the issue in the chamber.
READ MORE: Scottish Government has 'no plans for referendum on Holyrood powers'
“However, as far as I can ascertain, this has not been done,” she added.
“Can the Presiding Officer give guidance on how the official record can be amended to ensure that the high standard of scrutiny is maintained in this Parliament in the area of members' financial interests?”
In response, Presiding Officer Alison Johnstone (below) said: “I would take this opportunity to remind all members that it is a requirement of both the code of conduct and the relevant legislation that members make a declaration of interest before taking part in any proceedings of the parliament relating to their registered interests.
“Under the Code of Conduct I do not have responsibility for considering complaints of this nature and the responsibility to make appropriate declarations lies with members.”
Gosal has £700,000 in shares, a 50% interest, in APCL Trading LTD, £240,000 in shares, a 33.3% interest, in PCMG Ltd, and £162,500, a 50% interest, in Strathblane Developments LTD.
All three firms, as stated on Gosal’s public parliamentary register, are “concerned with the letting and operating of own or leased real estate”.
Following the exchange at FMQs, Gosal’s register of interests was updated to include the line “The company lets solely commercial property and I receive no remuneration from it,” after each entry.
The MSP for West of Scotland region claimed the rent cap, implemented through the Cost of Living (Tenant Protection) (Scotland) Act in 2022, had “exacerbated” the housing emergency.
Yousaf hit back and said Gosal’s comment was “the most Conservative contribution” he had ever heard in the chamber.
A Scottish Conservative spokesperson said: “As The National were made aware last week, Pam’s interests are not in residential property, so there was no relevant information to declare.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel