ANY move to raise the school starting age will be “utterly shambolic” unless it is properly funded, the leader of Scotland’s biggest teaching union has warned.
Andrea Bradley said that while the EIS supported the concept of an extended kindergarten experience, it was not feasible under current funding. She added that the union would not want to see any “opportunistic” move to deliver savings by raising the school age in terms of cuts to teacher numbers.
“An extended kindergarten experience would require significant additional funding in order for it to be high quality and would have to be designed, delivered and supported by qualified people,” she said.
READ MORE: Kate Forbes: Highlands communities are not asking for charity
“We believe teachers need to be part of that and as we are already significantly under-represented in the early education offer, we would not wish to see that eroded any further.”
Last week, SNP MSP Kaukab Stewart (below) put forward a motion to raise the school starting age, which gained cross-party support.
However, Bradley cast doubt over whether a quality extended kindergarten stage was possible in the light of existing cuts in early years education which she warned was going to be “incredibly costly” in the longer term.
“We would not like to see the same cost-cutting approach as has been taken to early years education so far in any future composition of any kindergarten stage,” she said.
Current legislation only states that early learners should have “access” to a teacher – and how this is interpreted varies widely across Scotland’s 32 local authorities.
It means that some children rarely see a qualified teacher during their entire nursery experience, according to Bradley, who argues there should be a minimum guarantee of the amount of time a teacher spends with nursery children.
“Play-based learning does not happen by accident,” she said. “There is pedagogy inherent in all of it and you need professionals to consider what type of play is going to result in the type of learning that you want – you can’t have that by accident.
“The EIS is not suggesting that contributions can’t be made by others to the early learning experience but what we are seeing is that teachers have been significantly sidelined out of that experience over the last 10 years and we see it as being entirely about cost-cutting. Cuts should not be setting education policy.”
Bradley said an extended kindergarten stage and later school entry age would be “very costly” if it were to be done properly.
“There would have to be a big discussion about the extent to which Scotland is prepared to fund something like this in order for it to work well, otherwise it will be utterly shambolic,” she said.
“We are in support of play-based learning but that is accompanied by heavy caution around how this might be organised, given the current state of finance and how the cuts agenda rather than education principle has been driving early years provision in recent years.”
Bradley added that there would have to be a significant shift in political will – not only to fund an extended kindergarten stage but to invest properly in all stages of education in Scotland.
READ MORE: Scotland should 'have new public broadcaster after independence'
“I don’t think it looks to be feasible as things stand,” she said. “For example, we currently have chronic underfunding of Additional Support Needs (ASN) provision and an unmet promise to teachers that their class contact time is going to be reduced to 21 hours per week.
“We also have the promise of 3500 additional teachers but for the second year in a row, teacher numbers have declined, so the sums are far from close to adding up.”
“These are all big-ticket items that we are still waiting to be delivered so while there is definite merit in the exploration of play-based learning, it is really difficult to see how this can delivered when these manifesto promises remain unmet.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel