TRADE union leaders have hit back after an anonymous Scottish Labour figure criticised workers in the civil service, claiming they had been “captured” by the SNP.
The unnamed Labour figure spoke to the Sunday Herald to claim that the civil service had been “captured wholesale”, going on: “The lines between political interest and public service have not just become blurred, they have disappeared.”
Similar allegations appeared in The Times over the weekend, which ran the headline: “How the SNP’ ‘captured’ Scotland’s civil service – and why it matters.”
It followed the Scots Tories calling for an investigation into “politicisation” of the civil service.
The criticism has focused on an email shown to the UK Covid Inquiry by the Scottish Government’s director of external affairs, Scott Wightman.
The email, sent during the pandemic, came during an exchange about whether to add Spain to Scotland’s quarantine list.
Wightman objected to its addition to the list saying that although the decision was being made for health reasons, the Spanish government may hold a political grudge and block a future independent Scotland from joining the EU.
The email was sent on July 19, 2020 and Spain was shortly afterwards removed from the quarantine list, only to be added back on July 25.
A Scottish Labour source told the Herald the email showed “the extent of how pervasive the thought process of constitutional division has become in the civil service”.
READ MORE: 'How dare you?': Humza Yousaf hits back at 'Nigel Farage' comparison
But top trade unionists representing civil servants hit back at the allegations, calling it "dangerous" and saying politicians of all stripes should know better.
Dave Penman, the general secretary of the FDA public services union, said: "Politicians, whether in government or opposition, have a responsibility to protect the impartiality of the civil service.
“That includes not making sweeping accusations about an entire service based on an individual incident, however legitimate that concern is."
Richard Hardy, trade union Prospect’s national secretary for Scotland, also hit back. He wrote: "The civil service exists to advise on and implement Government policy, it’s not ‘capture’ when they do this.
“It’s very disappointing to find politicians attacking the civil service for doing their job. We are seeing this behaviour far too often recently."
The Civil Service exists to advise on and implement Government policy, it’s not “capture” when they do this. It’s very disappointing to find politicians attacking the civil service for doing their job. We are seeing this behaviour far to often recently https://t.co/bWqIeRj9LX
— Richard Hardy (@UnionTyke) February 4, 2024
Allan Sampson, the national officer for Scotland for the FDA, penned a piece in the Times in which he argued that “to suggest that large swathes of Scottish civil servants were working in contravention of the civil service code just isn’t based in reality, and is having a corrosive effect on public trust in our institutions”.
Sampson said in his article, which was shared by the FDA: “We’re starting to see a series of attacks that paint civil servants as political operatives seeking to cover up for the government at Holyrood.
“For this to go unchallenged sets a dangerous precedent. A civil servant’s duty of impartiality means they cannot speak up to defend themselves publicly, so it is the responsibility of ministers to defend them.
“We’ve seen this far too often in Westminster over recent years, where politicians have been more than willing to throw their staff under a bus for political expediency.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel