MICHELLE Mone reportedly denied she stood to gain financially from a PPE company – five months before £29 million of its profits were transferred into a trust for her benefit.
Leaked emails between Mone and the Cabinet Office revealed that a civil servant asked her to make a declaration that she had no conflict of interest in relation to the company, PPE Medpro, which she had recommended to ministers in May 2020, The Guardian reports.
Mone stated that she had “no conflicts whatsoever” and that she was not “entitled to any financial remuneration or financial benefit whatsoever”.
The former Tory peer eventually admitted to being involved with PPE Medpro, despite her past assurances she had nothing to do with the firm.
She is currently on a leave of absence from the House of Lords.
According to The Guardian, a Cabinet Office civil servant wrote to Mone, asking her for a “one-line statement to cover the lines we discussed so that we can document the declaration of no conflict”.
READ MORE: HMRC takes legal action against PPE firm linked to Tory peer Michelle Mone
She replied: “In relation to PPE Medpro Limited, I can confirm that I have no conflicts whatsoever in helping the company to achieve orders through the NHS. I am neither a shareholder of the company nor am I entitled to any financial remuneration or financial benefit whatsoever. You can put this on the record.
“My role is to help the NHS deliver on its PPE targets and to ultimately save lives of patients, medical workers and carers.”
This exchange was followed up by the civil servant asking about her husband Doug Barrowman’s involvement in the firm.
Mone (above) is said to have replied half an hour later with an email stating in large text at the top: “This is for the record.”
She wrote: “To clarify the position on Doug, he has made it clear from the outset that he has put the consortium together that constitutes PPE Medpro Ltd.
READ MORE: Michelle Mone claimed ALBERT EINSTEIN lived in her Glasgow home
“Behind the scenes he has significantly negotiated down the prices available to the NHS on PPE from the company. The end result is highly competitive pricing that ensures the NHS benefits from his years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains.
“Doug is a very philanthropic individual and his Barrowman Foundation supports schools building in Africa and he recently built a large centre in Manchester for the Prince’s Trust. He is passionate about the NHS and during the crisis has wanted to help the NHS. This he has done through the procurement of a plentiful supply of cost-effective PPE.”
The couple have had their assets frozen under a court order obtained by the Crown Prosecution Service.
Restrictions have been placed on £75m worth of assets, including a townhouse in Belgravia, properties in Glasgow, an estate on the Isle of Man and numerous bank accounts.
They are also under investigation by the National Crime Agency for potential fraud. Both deny any wrongdoing.
The Department for Health and Social Care is also suing Mone and Barrowman, claiming much of the medical kit the NHS bought from PPE Medpro was useless.
A spokesperson for Mone and Barrowman told The Guardian they were being “scapegoated” for Government failures in PPE procurement during the Covid pandemic.
They said: “The NCA investigation has been ongoing for almost three years. There were well over a thousand separate communications with HM Government/Department of Health and Social Care and the small number of messages you quote are taken out of context. Doug and Michelle deny any wrongdoing and have not been charged with any criminal offences.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel