ALISTER Jack should be investigated after he seemed to admit to breaching the ministerial code when giving evidence to the UK Covid Inquiry, the SNP have said.
In a letter to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak and Laurie Magnus, an aristocrat and financier serving as the UK Government’s independent adviser on ministers’ interests, SNP MP Tommy Sheppard said Jack had admitted to a “clear breach” of the code.
Sheppard wrote: “I am writing to request an investigation into whether the Secretary of State for Scotland, Alister Jack MP, broke the ministerial code by using his position as a minister to lobby for a significant section of his constituency to be included in a new £150 million ‘enhanced investment zone’.”
When giving evidence to the Covid Inquiry on February 1, Jack was asked if the “salient details” of his conversations with other government ministers were on the official record after he admitted to having deleted all of his WhatsApps from the pandemic.
READ MORE: 'Those are my questions': Alister Jack's inquiry session lasts just 80 minutes
Answering, Jack said that he had been lobbying for Stranraer and Cairnryan, which are in his Dumfries and Galloway constituency, to be included in an investment zone for Northern Ireland.
He said he had only informed the Scotland Office after he had lobbied different politicians about his goal.
Jack told the Covid Inquiry: “In the last 10 days I have had conversations with the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland directly about including Stranraer and Cairnryan in an investment zone for Northern Ireland, as we move towards Stormont hopefully being up and running again.
“I had a conversation with [DUP leader] Jeffrey Donaldson and I then came back to speak to my office directly and inform them that I'm trying to have Stranraer and Cairnryan included in an investment zone for Northern Ireland.”
READ MORE: SNP urge UK Government to back compensation bill for Waspi women
It is against the ministerial code for ministers to use their position in the government to seek any particular gain or special treatment for their own constituency.
Scots Tory MP Andrew Bowie was stripped of his responsibility over the UK’s energy grid over concerns linked to the same section of the code.
Sheppard, who serves as Jack’s shadow as the SNP’s Scotland spokesperson at Westminster, said: “Mr Jack’s comments during the Covid Inquiry clearly shows that he used his position as a minister to influence the enhanced investment zone for his constituency, which flies in the face of the ministerial code.
“However, this is something we’ve become accustomed to with this UK Tory government. Whether they’re handing out contracts worth millions of pounds for defunct PPE, or stuffing the House of Lords with their cronies and donors, their rank hypocrisy is clear for all to see.”
The UK Government has insisted that Jack was seeking benefit for Scotland, not specifically for his own constituency.
The Prime Minister is the ultimate arbiter of the ministerial code, but No 10 pointed The National to the Scotland Office for a response to Sheppard’s letter.
A Scotland Office spokesperson said: “Alister Jack was acting in his capacity as Secretary of State for Scotland.
“The NI / Stranraer Investment Zone would be a huge boost to jobs and the economy of southwest Scotland, strengthening Scotland’s economic ties with Northern Ireland and benefitting the entire of the UK.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel