ANAS Sarwar has been called out by the SNP for an “entirely untrue" claim made in a BBC interview ahead of a ceasefire motion in Westminster this week.
Speaking with presenter Martin Geissler, the Scottish Labour leader said that Labour whips had made contact with SNP whips ahead of the vote.
“I know our whips have already made contact with SNP whips to say, ultimately, we both want the same thing," Sarwar said. "We both want the violence to stop right now.”
Anas Sarwar may have finally fallen victim to his habit of making stuff up to get through awkward interviews. His claim that Labour whips have contacted SNP whips to discuss next week's 'Immediate Ceasefire' motion has been exposed as false by the SNP chief whip. pic.twitter.com/W7PTRnVDmz
— MSM Monitor (@msm_monitor) February 18, 2024
Sarwar made a similar comment at a press huddle at the party’s conference in Glasgow on Saturday.
Sarwar was asked about the distance between Scottish Labour and the UK party. He said: “I would suggest there’s probably no distance at all now. We’ve had repeated calls – from [shadow foreign secretary] David Lammy in recent days that he wants to fighting to stop right now.
“I know our whips have been in contact with the SNP whips to have a discussion about how we can unify around a motion and back a ceasefire."
But SNP chief whip Owen Thompson said it was “entirely untrue” that contact had been made.
@mmgeissler just listening to your interview with @AnasSarwar on #SundayShow. He claims Labour whips are discussing ceasefire vote with SNP Whips. As SNP Chief Whip I can say this is entirely untrue as there has been no contact with me
— Owen Thompson MP 🎗 (@OwenThompson) February 18, 2024
The MP for Midlothian wrote on Twitter/X: “[Martin Geissler,] just listening to your interview with @AnasSarwar on #SundayShow.
"He claims Labour whips are discussing ceasefire vote with SNP whips. As SNP chief whip I can say this is entirely untrue as there has been no contact with me.”
READ MORE: Scottish Labour register zero viewers as Anas Sarwar gives speech
Geissler read out Thompson's message on air after Sarwar's claims had been broadcast.
The claim and Thompson’s rejection of it has led to multiple comments from SNP MPs, MSPs and ministers.
“That’s the duplicity you get with @UKLabour and it’s Branch Office ‘up the road’,” tweeted MP Steven Bonnar.
SNP MSP Tom Arthur added: “There is a pattern here. Whether it's on Gaza, tax, or banker's bonuses, Anas Sarwar contradicts himself, U-turns, or just makes stuff up to get through an interview or a speech.
"It's the behaviour of a spokesperson taking orders rather than a leader thinking for themselves.”
In a letter sent to Starmer on Sunday, SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn said there had been no discussions, but offered to open them.
He wrote: "During the course of the Labour Party conference in Scotland, Anas Sarwar MSP publicly stated that the Labour Party would seek to hold discussions with our party ahead of the vote this Wednesday. He repeated that claim live on air during BBC Scotland’s ‘Sunday Show’ this morning. For clarity, as of now, we have not had any contact with anyone in the Labour Party seeking such a discussion.
"However, in the absence of contact from any of your Labour Party colleagues, I am now writing to make clear that I am of course willing to have such a discussion.
"Given the importance of this issue – literally a discussion on life and death – the very least the public would expect is that the leaders of the SNP and the Labour Party at Westminster can sit down and have a discussion on this ceasefire motion."
Scottish Labour have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel