THE SNP have walked out of the House of Commons in fury after the decision made by Speaker Lindsay Hoyle to allow a debate on a Labour amendment to an SNP motion saw Westminster descend into chaos.
Effectively, it meant that SNP MPs couldn't vote on their own motion. Instead, Labour's amendment was passed without opposition because deputy speaker Rosie Winterton declared "the ayes have it" without votes begin cast. Winterton's decision was criticised by both SNP and Tory MPs.
Shortly before the walk-out, the SNP's Brendan O'Hara said the Commons had "descended into absolute chaos because of the decision of the Speaker earlier today" and demanded Hoyle return to the Chamber.
Ordinarily, an opposition party like Labour would not be allowed to table an amendment to another opposition party’s motion put forward on an opposition day, like the SNP’s had been.
But Hoyle announced rules would be changed on Wednesday afternoon, ultimately saving Labour from a rebellion threat.
READ MORE: Labour 'threatened to bring Speaker down' before rule change on Gaza motion
The Speaker selected both UK Government and Labour amendments, the first time in at least 25 years that this has occurred on an Opposition Day, the clerk of the House confirmed - calling it a "departure from long-established convention".
Before the walk-out, Stephen Flynn, the SNP’s Westminster leader, angrily asked on three occasions where Hoyle was, as he called for the Speaker to return to the Commons.
On the third occasion, Flynn told the Commons: “I am afraid that I am going to have to try for a third time. Can you please advise me where the Speaker of the House of Commons is?
“What mechanisms are available to bring him to the House? And as we wait for a deliberation to be made in that regard, I move that this House … that you use the powers that I trust you have to suspend this House.”
Deputy speaker Rosie Winterton replied: “I will not be suspending the House. We need to put these questions. Mr Speaker will be in his place tomorrow.”
But Flynn was followed by similar calls from Conservative MP Matthew Offord (Hendon), who asked: “Madame Deputy Speaker, where is the Speaker?”
A vote on whether parliament should sit in private failed, before Hoyle ultimately did return to the chamber to give an explanation for his actions.
He insisted his decision had been taken with “the right intentions” as he responded to criticism in a special statement from Commons Leader Penny Mordaunt.
Hoyle said: “Today’s debate was exceptional in its intensity with which all parties wished to secure a vote.”
He said the decision taken was intended to allow the House “the widest range of propositions on which to express a view”, adding: “I wanted to do the best, and it was my wish … to do the best by every member of this House.”
He went on: “The danger is … because I am very, very concerned about the security of all members … I was very concerned, I am still concerned, and that’s why the meetings I have had today is about the security of members, their families and the people that are involved.
“And I’ve got to say, I regret how it’s ended up. It was not my intention. I wanted all to ensure they could express their views and all sides of the House could vote. As it was, in particular the SNP were ultimately unable to vote on their proposition.
“I am, and I regret … with my sadness, that it’s ended up … in this position. That was never my intention for it to end like this. I was absolutely convinced that the decision was done with the right intentions. I recognise the strength of feeling of members on this issue.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel