THE UK Government is refusing to release details of any meetings involving Foreign Office officials, Scottish ministers and representatives from a foreign government where independence was discussed.
A Freedom of Information (FOI) request asking for the notes from any such meetings has been rejected, with officials saying they can “neither confirm nor deny” that the information is held.
The reasons given by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) include that it would be likely to prejudice the relations between the UK and other states or international organisations, which would in turn prejudice the “interests of the UK abroad”.
It also states that if information is released it would likely to “prejudice relations with devolved administrations”.
READ MORE: SNP blast Westminster for 'silencing Scotland's voice'
In comes after former first minister Nicola Sturgeon’s former chief of staff Liz Lloyd said foreign leaders have expressed their support for independence on multiple occasions – despite the presence of senior Foreign Office officials.
Liz Lloyd said that this had included a “prominent foreign prime minister” and that official minutes would “no doubt be exchanged” between civil servants afterwards.
Her comments writing in The Times last year came after a row over Humza Yousaf meeting with international leaders at COP28.
The failure to release the information was criticised by SNP MSP Kevin Stewart, who said: "It is utterly bizarre for the UK Government to be withholding this information, it is also extremely concerning that they are specifically withholding information because it might "harm" relationships with the devolved governments.”
He described the UK Government’s FOI process as an “absolute farce”.
"It is beyond time it was reformed so the people of Scotland can truly find out what the UK Government are up to,” he added.
"All this does is beg the question – what exactly are they trying to hide?"
There has been rising tensions between the Scottish and UK governments in recent months over meetings with foreign officials.
Foreign Secretary Lord David Cameron threatened to withdraw co-operation with Scottish ministers after Yousaf met with Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan (above).
Cameron said it was a breach of protocol without a UK official present, but a spokesman for Yousaf said one had been invited.
READ MORE: Refugee councillor blasts Humza Yousaf over Erdogan handshake
In response to the row, Lloyd had claimed it was in fact foreign governments who often tried to block UK officials from attending meetings with SNP ministers.
She said: “It was other countries — not Scotland — who would suggest ways (which we rarely took up) of meeting without a UK presence.
“There was nothing underhand in these proposed conversations, no opinions expressed that the UK would not already be aware of and official minutes and informal read-outs would no doubt be exchanged between civil servants afterwards.”
Lloyd said there was a “resistance” from other countries to the idea they had to be watched while engaging with Scottish representatives and spoke of several occasions whereby UK officials were present when foreign politicians and leaders expressed support for Scottish independence.
She said: “One poor UK ambassador had to sit through a dinner in an independent-minded country where politicians of different parties spoke of their personal support for the idea of Scottish independence — not at the suggestion of the Scottish first minister but at the invitation of their head of state.
“Another listened stoney-faced as a prominent foreign prime minister extended their best wishes to the Scottish Government in its cause.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel