RISHI Sunak has said that MP Lee Anderson’s remarks that sparked an Islamophobia row “weren’t acceptable”.
Speaking to the BBC on Monday morning, he said the comments were “wrong” as he denied his party has Islamophobic tendencies.
Former Tory deputy chairman Lee Anderson lost the Conservative whip after failing to apologise for claiming “Islamists” had “got control” of London Mayor Sadiq Khan.
READ MORE: SNP approach Labour and LibDems ahead of Gaza ceasefire debate redux
The Prime Minister came in for criticism over the weekend for failing to comment publicly on the suspension.
Anderson will now sit as an independent unless he defects to another party, after he accepted the PM and chief whip Simon Hart had been put in a “difficult position” with “no option” but to take disciplinary action.
Sunak said the comments were “wrong” particularly as “tensions are running high in the country”, as he said his priority was “to take the heat out of this situation”.
However, he insisted there were no Islamophobic tendencies in his party and said it is “incumbent” on politicians not to inflame tensions.
Prior to Sunak’s comments, deputy PM Oliver Dowden (below) said he disagreed with the language used, but did not believe Anderson had been “intending” to be Islamophobic.
The suspension comes amid a wider row about language used by a number of senior Tories, including former home secretary Suella Braverman and former PM Liz Truss – who recently claimed her efforts to cut taxes were “sabotaged” by “the deep state”.
She also remained silent during an interview with Steve Bannon in which he hailed far-right figure Tommy Robinson a “hero”.
Elsewhere, Humza Yousaf was among those to call out Braverman as the “worst of politicians” after she claimed Islamist extremists are now controlling the UK in a column for The Daily Telegraph.
She said Britain is “sleepwalking into a ghettoised society” and said that “the Islamists, the extremists, and the antisemites are in charge now”.
Meanwhile, the Muslim Council of Britain has said the Tories must launch an investigation into “structural Islamophobia” within its ranks.
Tory MP complaints
However, Sky News’ deputy political editor Sam Coates has reported that not everybody is happy with Anderson’s suspension.
He said he had seen leaked WhatsApp messages from the “109 group” which is made up of Tories elected for the first time in 2019.
Tory MPs have complained that suspending Lee Anderson may have been a mistake, WhatsApp messages leaked to Sky News have revealed.
— Sky News (@SkyNews) February 26, 2024
Sky's @SamCoatesSky explains 👇
Latest: https://t.co/s4MaSSPkwZ
📺 Sky 501, Virgin 602, Freeview 233 and YouTube pic.twitter.com/UAQXPL9SVY
Coates reports that Tory MP for Hartlepool Jill Mortimer shared a message saying her constituents claimed, “they would not vote Tory again”.
“Lee Anderson’s suspension is the final nail in the party’s coffin,” she added.
The MP for Darlington, Peter Gibson reported that his inbox was full of “positive” messages for Anderson.
A spokesperson for the Tory party said: “An investigation into and subsequent independent review, both conducted over several years by Professor Swaran Singh, found no evidence of institutional racism in the Conservative Party.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel