OPPOSITION councillors have hit out at the 10 per cent council tax rise in Argyll and Bute – with one saying he is “ashamed” to have been part of the process.
Argyll and Bute is run by a coalition of LibDem, Conservative and Independent councillors.
Members of the authority’s Strategic Opposition Partnership, made up of SNP, Labour and some independent councillors, tabled a budget amendment last week which would have seen no increase in council tax.
But the proposal, which would have aligned with First Minister Humza Yousaf’s pledge that the tax would not increase, failed by two votes.
READ MORE: Edinburgh Council Unionists make 'grubby deal' amid council tax freeze
The council set its budget at its full meeting on Thursday, February 22, with Lomond North Independent councillor Mark Irvine immediately registering his disapproval.
Councillor Irvine said: “I am ashamed to have been part of a process where political point scoring took priority over the real needs of the residents of Argyll and Bute.
“The administration just want to blame the Scottish Government and hide behind that while they ram another 10 per cent increase down our throats.
“The administration coalition (TALIG – The Argyll, Lomond and Islands Group) simply don’t care that people are struggling with rent increases, rising fuel costs, high-interest rates and high inflation. Many families are living in poverty and relying on food banks to make ends meet. It’s scandalous and shameful to ask them to find hundreds of pounds more in council tax.
READ MORE: Scottish ministers urged to pledge no more council tax freezes
“I voted for the total freeze which was proposed by the opposition group and by prudent use of reserves we would maintain our services and manage to help ease the burden on the hardworking folk of Helensburgh and Lomond.
“It is scandalous to heap more misery on the residents of our area when the council has more than enough cash reserves to ease the budget pressures.”
Helensburgh Central Labour councillor Fiona Howard also slammed the decision, but her ward colleague, Conservative councillor Gary Mulvaney, policy lead for financial services, said he “would not take any lessons” from the pair.
Councillor Howard added: “I am totally disgusted by the imposition of any council tax rise when there was a viable option which would have saved the people of Argyll and Bute a huge amount of pain, but advocating a rise of 10 per cent is something I consider utterly despicable.
“The members of the Argyll and Bute administration have shown themselves to be without any humanity and to actually admit that there was plenty of money in the reserves and then to still go ahead with that rise is beyond the understanding of anyone with a conscience.
“I am proud of the balanced and fair budget proposed by the opposition members and truly disappointed that common sense and compassion lost the day.”
READ MORE: Shona Robison issues warning to local authorities over council tax
Tory councillor Mulvaney responded: “We had gaps of £10 million on the revenue budget and £30 million on capital when we started the budget process.
“With the persistent underfunding of councils by the Scottish Government, we needed to protect services, jobs and future investment. No one lightly takes these decisions and our budget reduces future revenue gaps by £3 million every year through that council tax increase. That in turns protects service and jobs in the future.
“The opposition budget raided most of the reserves with no plan for next year. Unbelievably, their plan swiped £3million of a £6million pot for social care.
“So I will take no lessons on politicking and compassion from an elected independent and Labour councillor that work hand in glove with the SNP.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel