“I AM a Unionist. I don’t like nationalism. I don’t think it’s good … because I think for me nationalism is insular, it’s looking inwards.”
Those are the words of Jo Stevens, a senior Labour MP serving in Keir Starmer’s shadow Cabinet.
Unluckily for Jo, her party leader seems determined to undermine any and every claim that their party is not, in fact, deeply nationalist.
Even without all the Union flags on display at every turn – including now on their party membership cards – Starmer’s latest line means that even the most die-hard supporter would struggle to deny his nationalist tendencies. Wait, sorry, patriotic tendencies.
READ MORE: Wee Ginger Dug: Labour's naked nationalism is revealed by more than Union flags
“My Labour government will be different,” Starmer said on Monday. “We’ll run a patriotic economy where Britain’s interest is centre stage and Britain’s hardworking families reap the rewards.”
Trumpeting Starmer’s comments, the Labour party then wrote on social media: “Labour has a plan for housing that will give you and your family the stability and security you need. A future built in Britain, by Britain, for Britain.”
It’s a good thing Labour is not nationalist and insular. Otherwise, those claims about putting “Britain’s interest centre stage” would look a lot like Donald Trump’s “America First”.
But despite Labour’s best attempts, not everyone is blind to what Starmer’s words actually mean.
That will explain the backlash after the party trotted out its “patriotic economy” line ahead of Starmer’s visit to the West Midlands.
“The economy's not patriotic enough guys! That's the problem ... Do I laugh or cry at this point?” one user wrote on social media.
“What is a patriotic economy other than just a massive dogwhistle term …” another added.
What on earth is a "patriotic economy"?
— Muslim Association of Britain (MAB) (@MABOnline1) February 26, 2024
Will the banks and the stock exchange have to sing God Save The King when markets open every morning?
Will Banker bonuses be paid in Union Jack flags? https://t.co/PKPZNKZ54I
The Muslim Association of Britain (MAB) also called out the Labour leader, writing: “What on earth is a ‘patriotic economy’?
“Will the banks and the stock exchange have to sing God Save The King when markets open every morning?
“Will banker bonuses be paid in Union Jack flags?”
If policy is anything to go by (it increasingly is not after Starmer’s seemingly endless U-turns), Labour’s patriotic economy will be one in which bankers are allowed unlimited bonuses but children forced into poverty through accidents of birth are kept there.
How strikingly similar to the current Tory-run economy.
Others riffed on a similar idea, with one user quipping: “A patriotic economy means your foodbank parcel will come wrapped in the Union Jack.”
Another wrote: “I was honestly surprised to hear that Keir Starmer came up with the ‘patriotic economy’. I was absolutely certain it must have been something Liz Truss spouted at BonkersCon.”
If only.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel