KEIR Starmer has not even acknowledged an invitation to Bute House to discuss child poverty and other key issues, First Minister Humza Yousaf has said – more than a month after the offer was made.
The SNP leader told press at an event in Edinburgh that he was “still waiting for a reply, even an acknowledgement” from Starmer after issuing the invitation on January 21.
In a letter sent to the Labour leader, Yousaf had invited Starmer to meet to “discuss how intergovernmental relations might be improved in the event of UK Labour forming the UK government after the next General Election, in order that our governments would be better able to address vital issues for our economy and society: first and foremost the fight against poverty”.
I’ve invited Sir Keir Starmer to meet to discuss:
— Humza Yousaf (@HumzaYousaf) January 21, 2024
❌ Scrapping two-child limit
✅ Replicating Scottish Child Payment across UK
⚡️ Delivering net zero investment for a just transition
🇪🇺 Single market membership to mitigate the damage of Brexit
🏴 Scotland's constitutional future pic.twitter.com/l3lFCcBhft
On Wednesday, the First Minister spoke to the media after publishing modelling showing that Scottish Government policies were expected to lift 100,000 children out of relative poverty in 2024-25 – and 70,000 out of deep poverty – compared to if devolution did not exist.
Asked if hitting child poverty targets was realistic given that the modelling also showed a slight increase in absolute child poverty from 2023-24 to 2024-2025, Yousaf said: “It's going to be difficult. It's going to be challenging. That's why I'm also calling on the UK Government to help, not just here in Scotland, but right across the UK.
"Lifting the two-child limit, introducing an essentials guarantee, making some changes to how Universal Credit is awarded, these actions could, for example, cumulatively help to lift a further 40,000 children in Scotland out of poverty.
“So that would greatly help on our way to those overall targets, let alone the interim targets.”
He went on: “We would be greatly aided in that endeavour by, of course, the restoration of cuts to our budget, but also by the UK Government, who still continue to hold many of the levers to help lift children out of poverty.
“It is why I'm so frustrated and disappointed that Keir Starmer hasn't responded. I mean, I'm not expecting a response from the Conservatives. I think they've made it very clear that they are OK to give tax cuts to those at the highest level of the scale. They're happy to do that at the expense of children and families.
“I wouldn’t expect any less from the Conservatives, but it’s a shame that I've not had a response from Keir Starmer.”
Responding to Yousaf, a Labour spokesperson accused him of playing "games".
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn responds to reports that SNP will 'disengage' from Westminster
They said: “The SNP have completely failed on child poverty in Scotland. It’s no wonder that Scots are crying out for change not just from them, but from the Tories too.
“From a culture of secrecy and cover-up to life-threatening failures in our NHS, Humza Yousaf’s party is failing working people across Scotland, and it is high time he focused on fixing the mess the SNP have made instead of playing political games.
"Only a Labour government, with Scottish Labour MPs, can deliver the change that Scotland and all of the UK needs.”
The Scottish Government analysis says it has considered a person to be in “deep poverty” if their equivalised household income after housing costs is below 50% of the median, as compared to 60% of the median on the “relative poverty” measure.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel