PLAID Cymru have written to the UK Government to call for an end to the “outdated” Barnett Formula.
The party has urged the Secretary of State for Wales, David TC Davies, to review and replace the mechanism which used by the Treasury to calculate annual block grants for devolved nations.
Liz Saville Roberts, Plaid Cymru’s Westminster leader, wants the UK Government to use the Spring Budget next week to introduce a system that delivers more equitable funding for Wales.
It comes after the party’s leader Rhun Ap Iorwerth told The National he would like to work with the SNP to make funding for devolved nations fairer across the UK.
The Barnett Formula was introduced in the 1970s and calculates funding for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland based on population size as well as the range of public services in each nation.
READ MORE: Rochdale by-election in numbers amid record-breaking Labour loss
It calculates devolved budgets by using the previous year’s budget as a starting point, and then adjusting it based on increases and decreases in comparable spending per person in England.
But the system is often called out for not meeting the needs of each nation, with Scotland’s former finance secretary Kate Forbes calling Scotland’s fiscal framework a “straitjacket” in December.
During her appearance at the Covid inquiry, Forbes also highlighted how the Barrnett Formula “couldn’t bear the weight of an emergency”.
She said the systems in place simply did not provide the Scottish Government with the guarantees required to plan their pandemic response in the most efficient manner.
Plaid Cymru have insisted the Barnett Formula is open to political manipulation and is not transparent given that when funding announcements are made in England, it may take months to find out how much Barnett consequential funding devolved nations will receive.
Saville Roberts (above) said: “One thing that is in the gift of this Government is the need for so many of our problems to be solved via fair funding. This requires reviewing and replacing the outdated Barnett Formula with a system that delivers equitable funding for all parts of Wales.
READ MORE: Rochdale: George Galloway overturns Labour majority in by-election win
“There are several reasons why the formula must be replaced. Firstly, it doesn’t address our needs. Secondly, it isn’t clear or transparent. When funding announcements are made in England, it may take weeks or months to find out if and how much Barnett consequential funding Wales will receive.
“Thirdly, we all know the formula is open to political manipulation, with Wales being robbed of at least £3.9 billion through the HS2 funding fiasco.
“Looking ahead to the Spring Budget, I would hope that the Government would show they are intending on tackling the deep structural problems that Wales faces, although I’m not going to hold my breath.”
Plaid Cymru say Wales’ funding floor is not based on the nation’s current level of assessed need, but rather on estimates made by the Holtham Commission in 2010 that drew from 2001 Census data.
For Wales, problems with the formula were laid bare when the UK Government scrapped the northern leg of HS2 last year.
The initiative was regarded as an “England and Wales” project” with the assertion there would be benefits to parts of Wales including reduced journey times when the £180bn project reached Crewe.
But in the end, with the northern leg ditched, opposition politicians argued Wales missed out on £5bn in rail infrastructure investment having received no Barnett consequentials while Scotland and Northern Ireland did.
Forbes argued in December that the UK Government’s block grant is still “the most critical element” of Scotland’s Budget.
She said: “Remember what is spent on health/education/transport in England is what generates the funding for Scotland. It’s not based on need, it’s based on Tory choices.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel