KEIR Starmer’s reputation for untrustworthiness has reached new heights, according to the latest polling.
YouGov has tracked the public’s perception of the Labour leader’s trustworthiness since he took office in April 2020.
According to the pollster, 47% of people viewed him as untrustworthy – the highest level since he became Labour leader.
That’s compared with just 25% of people who say he is trustworthy. The percentage of people who think Starmer untrustworthy has remained above 40% since May, 2023.
Voters also view Starmer as indecisive, according to YouGov. According to another tracker, the Labour leader is seen as indecisive by 52% of people. Just 22% think he is decisive.
And researchers at YouGov have also discovered the public think Starmer has fumbled Labour’s response to the Gaza crisis.
Just 14% of Britons view Starmer as having handled Labour’s response to Gaza well – compared with 52% who say he has handled it badly.
Starmer is seen as having managed the issue poorly by those on all sides of the conflict: 67% of those who sympathise primarily with the Palestinians say so, as do 69% of those who sympathise most with the Israelis, and 53% of those who sympathise with both sides equally, according to YouGov.
READ MORE: 'Try and stop me': MPs defy plans to ban them engaging with pro-Palestine groups
Overall, the public take a similar view to Rishi Sunak’s handling of the crisis, with 52% saying he has responded badly.
Starmer’s perceived lack of trustworthiness and indecisiveness will be key attack points against Labour in the upcoming General Election.
Both the SNP and the Conservatives have criticised Starmer for his frequent U-turns.
He also came under fire after initially refusing to suspend Labour’s candidate in the Rochdale by-election who was accused of being anti-semitic, despite Starmer frequently boasting of having rooted out anti-Jewish prejudice from his party.
The SNP's Mhairi Black said: "This poll is not surprising. Sir Keir Starmer has broken so many promises and performed so many U-turns, it's hard to believe a word he says.
“Capping bankers’ bonuses, lifting the two child benefit cap, abolishing tuition fees and the House of Lords, and a referendum on Brexit are some of the many Labour pledges that now lie on the scrap heap.
“And Starmer’s latest U-turn on the £28bn green investment is symptomatic of a bigger problem.
"The UK economy is already broken, and by signing up to Brexit and Tory fiscal rules, Starmer is setting the UK on the path to another decade of poor growth and harmful cuts to public services."
Greens MSP Gillian Mackay added: "It is no wonder that so few people trust Sir Keir Starmer. He's gone back on almost every single pledge and promise he's ever made and already discounted large parts of the policy programme he stood on when asking to be made Labour leader.
"Over the last few months he has tried to face all ways on the humanitarian crisis that has been inflicted on Gaza while using parliamentary games to avoid accountability.
"The general election can't simply be a choice between discredited Tory government and a distrusted Labour opposition. Scotland deserves far better than that.
"That is why the Scottish Greens will be offering a positive, progressive and hopeful vision for a fairer, greener and better future."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel