AN SNP MP has accused the UK Government of “undermining Scotland” after analysis found that the block grant will be the lowest since devolution.
Pete Wishart, the party’s longest-serving MP, has said the Scottish Government’s funding from Westminster would exacerbate the cost crisis facing households.
New analysis (below) from the House of Commons Library suggests that Scotland’s block grant will consist of just 3.5% of UK Government spending in 2023/24 and 2024/25, according to the Autumn Statement plans.
The Scottish Government's funds are mostly set by the UK Government through the block grant – the size of which is determined by the Barnett formula.
The research suggests it will be the first time the figure has dropped so low since the devolution settlement began.
The previous low of 3.6% was issued in 2014/15 and for three consecutive years from 2016/17 (full table below).
Reacting to the analysis, Wishart said that Scotland is “routinely treated with contempt” by Westminster.
“And here we have even more proof that we are being short-changed and sidelined,” he added.
The comments come ahead of Chancellor Jeremy Hunt’s spring Budget on Wednesday, with Deputy First Minister Shona Robison pushing for an increase in funding to the devolved administrations through Barnett consequentials.
This call was also echoed by SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn, who urged the Chancellor to boost NHS spending by £15 billion to create an additional £1.2 billion for Scottish health spending via the same mechanism.
READ MORE: Are Unionists right to say the Scottish Government's budget is not 'fixed'?
Wishart, meanwhile, was sharp in his criticism of the impact of Tory “economic mismanagement”.
“Scotland’s economy has taken a sharp hit from a combination of Westminster’s Brexit and Tory economic mismanagement – neither of which we voted for,” he said.
“To make significant cuts to the block grant after already imposing economic chaos on Scotland shows the UK Government couldn’t care less about businesses and households here.
“Tory cuts are already causing hardship for people in Scotland – to the point the SNP Scottish Government has had to step in and spend billions to limit the damage being done to households. This cut to our block grant will make things worse.”
He added: “This isn’t a one-off, it’s part of a pattern – Westminster has repeatedly undermined Scotland and our government through economic mismanagement, austerity cuts, imposing Brexit or attempting power grabs.
“It’s clear that Westminster cannot be trusted to serve Scotland’s needs.
“And with Labour signed up to the same Tory policies that are harming Scotland and our economy, it’s obvious there’s no true alternative. Only a vote for the SNP at the next election will ensure we have MPs who will stand up for Scotland, our values and our right to choose our future.”
The UK Government said Scotland receives about 25% more funding per person than equivalent spending in other parts of the UK.
A Treasury spokesman said: “The Scottish Government is currently receiving a record £41 billion per year funding settlement from the UK Government – the largest in the history of devolution and one that was further topped up by decisions taken at autumn statement.
“Health is the Scottish Government’s devolved responsibility – one it is well-funded to meet and deliver on for the people of Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel