THE Scottish oil and gas industry is one of the big losers of the UK Spring Budget, the Chancellor has said.
Jeremy Hunt made the comment – which will attract further anger from both the Conservatives north of the Border and the SNP – on Thursday morning.
The Chancellor had rebuffed reported threats to quit from Scottish Tory leader Douglas Ross over plans to extend the windfall tax in order to fund a cut to National Insurance.
In his Spring Budget statement on Wednesday, Hunt confirmed he would “extend the sunset on the Energy Profits Levy for an additional year to 2029, raising £1.5 billion”.
READ MORE: Jeremy Hunt snubs Scottish Tory pleas with windfall tax extension in Budget
Ross has criticised the move, saying he will not vote for it in the Commons, and Scottish Tory minister Andrew Bowie has also spoken against the extension. If he were to vote against it, he would have to resign his position in the UK Government.
Speaking to the BBC Radio 4 Today programme on Thursday, Hunt was asked who the big losers from his Budget were. He singled out “non-doms” due to changes in tax, and the Scottish oil and gas industry.
Hunt said: "Who are the losers? I'm trying to answer your question directly. Foreigners who are resident in the UK who are able to pay a cheque and avoid paying tax at the same rate as everyone else, the so-called non-doms. They are going to be paying significantly more tax.
"I've also asked the Scottish oil and gas industry to pay an additional contribution. Because the war in Ukraine is lasting longer, oil and gas prices are going to stay higher for longer. I think it's fair they can make an additional contribution."
The words are likely to come back to haunt the Tories north of the Border. BBC journalist Nick Eardley said Hunt (below) had thrown "a bit of a grenade to his Scottish colleagues this morning".
Hunt further clashed with Radio 4 Today programme presenter Amol Rajan as he accused the broadcaster of giving a characterisation of the economy which is “unworthy of the BBC”.
Rajan said he was stating facts when the Chancellor objected to being told: “We’ve seen seven quarters of GDP per head that’s been revised downwards. We’re hooked on foreign labour. The birth rate is collapsing. Many public services are creaking. Councils are going bust. Those are facts.”
Hunt replied: “I think the characterisation that you’ve just given of the British economy is unworthy of the BBC.”
Hunt added: “I’m afraid I don’t share your pessimism.”
READ MORE: Westminster is failing us – it's time to stop respecting the ‘mother of parliaments’
As the two spoke over one another, Rajan said: “The BBC is an organisation with tens of thousands of people who do lots of different things.”
Hunt also signalled that the Tory government would like to get rid of National Insurance on Wednesday.
Responding, Labour shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves said: “Yesterday, at the end of the Budget, the Chancellor started floating this idea that he was going to get rid of National Insurance altogether.
“Well, that would cost £46 billion. And I would like to know where that money is going to come from, because I just wouldn’t make a promise like that without being able to say where the money is going to come from.
“I think it is incumbent on politicians to be honest about the trade offs that have to be made.”
However, Paul Johnson, the director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said that both the Conservatives and Labour are engaged in a “conspiracy of silence” about what will happen to the public finances after the General Election.
He said: “This was not a Budget which addressed the real challenges we are facing because it was not transparent about what those challenges are.
“Government and opposition are joining in a conspiracy of silence in not acknowledging the scale of the choices and trade-offs that will face us after the election.
“They, and we, could be in for a rude awakening when those choices become unavoidable.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel