POLICE Scotland will no longer investigate every crime after the success of a pilot in the north east.
The pilot scheme, announced in September 2023, saw officers no longer take action on some minor crimes in order to focus more on emergency response and public safety.
On Thursday, an evaluation of the “Proportionate Response to Crime” scheme was published, recommending that the methodology be rolled out across all of Scotland.
Police said that during the 12-week trial, five per cent of crimes reported in A Division (Aberdeen, Aberdeenshire and Moray) were filed for no further enquiry, freeing up 2657 police officer hours.
Examples of crimes that were listed for no further inquiry included:
- A caller whose car’s bumper was damaged in a car park, with no CCTV present or note left.
- A caller who returned home after four weeks away to find two garden ornaments missing, with no CCTV or witnesses.
- A caller who had delivery of a parcel confirmed, only for it to be missing when they returned home, with no CCTV or witnesses.
- A caller who left their bag unattended in a park, and realised their phone was missing when they got home.
The decision not to take action on a particular crime report came after “an assessment of threat, harm, risk, vulnerability, and for proportionate lines of investigation and evidence”, police said.
Police said that people who report crimes will now be told that there is no hope of an investigation “more quickly” than they previously would have been.
The force also reported that, since the introduction of the process in the north east, public satisfaction rates have improved while more people who contact the police also said they got an appropriate response.
Prior to the pilot, 72 per cent of A Division officers reported they would regularly be allocated crime reports where no proportionate lines of enquiry existed.
At the conclusion of the pilot, 68 per cent of them said they had noticed a positive difference to their workload, and 56 per cent felt they had more time to investigate crime reports which had proportionate lines of enquiry.
Assistant Chief Constable Emma Bond said: “The Proportionate Response to Crime process is not a policy of non-investigation – we are committed to investigating crime.
“Taking a proportionate response to crime is not a new concept but we’ve never had a national process or standard across Scotland.
“Our evaluation recommends this process is rolled out across the rest of the service and we intend to do this on a phased basis with ongoing engagement and evaluation.
READ MORE: Police appeal amid 'growing concern' for man missing in Highlands for three days
“Every crime report is subject of individual assessment of threat, harm, risk, vulnerability and for proportionate lines of investigation and evidence, and that won't change.
“If there are no lines of enquiry that can be pursued, then we should be clear about that with the person who has contacted us. The public will be informed about the progress of their report more quickly, rather than waiting days for officers to make contact to inform them of the same outcome.
“By taking a proportionate response to crime reporting, we can give officers more time to focus on local policing, keeping people safe from harm, protecting the vulnerable, bringing criminals to justice, solving problems, and reducing offending.
“Please continue to report crime to us. All reports are recorded and - even if they are closed - are passed to our local policing teams to be kept under review and to help build an intelligence picture enabling them to proactively respond to local concerns.
“We have listened carefully to feedback about the process during the pilot period and we’re using this important information to further shape the process and engage with partner organisations.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel