MORE than 50 victims of Islamist-inspired terror attacks have signed a joint letter calling for an end to anti-Muslim hate.
They warn it is the “height of irresponsibility” for some politicians to equate “being Muslim with being an extremist”.
“The single most important thing we can do is to isolate the extremists and the terrorists from the vast majority of British Muslims who deplore such violence,” the letter adds.
Signatories include survivors and relatives of those killed in attacks in the UK and around the world.
Among them are Rebecca Rigby (below), whose husband Lee was killed by two extremists outside the Royal Artillery Barracks in Woolwich, south-east London, in May 2013, and Magen Inon, whose parents were killed in Hamas’s attack on Israel on October 7 last year.
Justine Merton-Scott, a survivor of the attack on the Bataclan theatre in Paris in November 2015, and Michelle Hussain, a survivor of the Manchester Arena bombing in May 2017 also signed.
It comes as Communities Secretary Michael Gove is expected to produce a new official definition of extremism within days.
READ MORE: Tory MSP accuses Humza Yousaf of 'overreaction' in 'Islamophobia' row
Gove told the Sunday Telegraph pro-Palestinian marchers extremist groups were behind some of the protests, and that the new definition will help protesters decide whether to attend events.
“Some of the events that have been organised, have been organised by extremist organisations,” he said.
“That doesn’t mean that people who have gone on them are extremist, quite the opposite. But it means that you can begin to question: do you really want to be lending credence to this organisation?”
The letter – signed by 58 victims – says they are “only too aware” of the threat of “Islamist extremism,” but added that it is wrong to conflate extremists with the vast majority of British Muslims.
“This is not only wrong in itself, it makes the job of the Islamist extremists easier and plays into the hands of terrorists […] We also know where anti-Muslim hate can lead.
“While Islamist-inspired extremism is our country’s most pressing terror threat, it is not our only one – and responding to it by feeding far-right extremism, dividing our communities and exaggerating the risk will feed a cycle of extremism that will put more people at risk.
“It is the height of irresponsibility.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel