KEIR Starmer will not be referred to the Commons Privileges Committee for investigation over the Gaza ceasefire debate, deputy speakers have said.
SNP, Conservative and Plaid Cymru MPs had requested an investigation alleging the Labour leader pressured Lindsay Hoyle to select his party’s amendment during an SNP Opposition Day last month.
But in a letter, all three deputy speakers have unanimously ruled: "The Speaker's role requires his conversations with Members to remain confidential. All parties should be able to rely on that confidentiality. Allowing matters of privilege to be raised on the content of confidential conversations would undermine that principle.”
The letter - seen by The Times - addressed to the SNP's chief whip Owen Thompson, the Conservatives' Graham Brady and Plaid Cymru's Liz Saville-Roberts adds there is a "high bar" for raising complaints of breach of privilege.
The deputy speakers Rosie Winterton, Nigel Evans and Eleanor Laing said their ruling was based on advice and precedence.
READ MORE: Telegraph 'explicitly tried to link Humza Yousaf to terrorism'
It goes on: "The complaint is founded on third party reports of conversations held in confidence between Mr Speaker and others, including the Leader of the Opposition.
"The Speaker regularly has conversations in confidence with Members, including party leaders and whips. This is normal pratice.
"There is no precedent for granting precedence to a complaint based purely on allegations of what might or might not have been said in a private meeting.
"There are no direct accounts of what was said from anyone who was actually in the room.
"We have decided not to give this matter precedence. Our decision is unanimous."
Almost 100 MPs signed a motion of no confidence in Hoyle after he broke with convention to select a Labour amendment as well as a Government one to be heard on an SNP Opposition Day.
This eventually resulted in an SNP motion calling for a ceasefire in Gaza and highlighting the "collective punishment" of Palestinians by Israel not being voted on.
READ MORE: Sky News: Keir Starmer dodges questions on public service cuts
The Labour amendment - which did call for a ceasefire but did not mention collective punishment - was nodded through.
Starmer "categorically" denied having threatened the Speaker after accusations were made that Hoyle helped the Labour leader avoid another damaging revolt over the Middle East issue.
He claimed he "simply urged” Hoyle to have “the broadest possible debate” by putting a number of options in front of MPs during the debate.
Labour MP Chris Bryant admitted he was ordered to filibuster to block progress on the SNP's motion and accepted the party had brought itself "terribly into disrepute".
The Speaker subsequently denied the SNP an emergency debate on Gaza despite explicitly offering one after the chaos caused by his decision.
SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn accused him of "failing the people of Gaza".
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel