A BID to build nearly 80 new homes on derelict land once used as a caravan sales site has been rejected amid concern over a loss of trees on the site.
Plans for 78 new homes at the former Scotts Touring Caravans site in Mayfield, Dalkeith, were lodged by applicants Online Mayfield Scotland LLP with Midlothian Council.
But at a meeting of the local authority’s planning committee this week, members voted to reject the proposals after officials said the land, which was not earmarked for housing, had 125 trees on it, many of which would be lost.
The planned housing had been welcomed by Mayfield and Easthouses Community Council as well as Councillor Stuart McKenzie, the administration’s housing spokesperson, who told the meeting the site was “an eyesore which causes angst for the people who live there”.
READ MORE: Scotland flood victims: Holyrood fails to confirm financial support
He said: “Putting on my housing convenor hat I would look at that (site) and say ‘is there a housing need in that area’ and the answer is an emphatic yes.”
Planning officers recommended councillors refuse the application describing it as ‘windfall’ housing which was not on land designated for homes in the authority’s local development plan.
In their report they said there was no justification for allowing the site, which ceased operating as a caravan sales site over a decade ago, to be turned into housing and warned there would be “significant and unacceptable loss of trees” if it was approved.
The report said that two buildings which had been on the site had now been demolished and acknowledged the applicant’s statement that it was a chance to redevelop the land.
However the report said: “Whilst the planning authority would welcome appropriate redevelopment of this vacant and derelict site, it is the planning authority’s view that the proposed development is not appropriate for the site and that any policy support for redevelopment is insufficient to outweigh the lack of support for the principle of major scale non-allocated residential development on the site.”
The council received one objection from a local resident whose garden backs on to the site.
Councillors raised concerns about the impact of increased traffic from the new site and lack of GP services to cope with additional residents.
The committee voted by ten votes to six to refuse planning permission in principle for the housing.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel