BILLIONAIRES JK Rowling and Elon Musk have both taken aim at Scotland’s new hate crime laws, which are set to come into effect next month.
Rowling, best known for writing the Harry Potter book series, has said she will not delete social media posts that could breach the new hate crime laws – which she branded “ludicrous”.
The controversial legislation will make it an offence to stir up hatred against protected characteristics, including age, disability, religion, sexual orientation and gender identity.
However, concerns have been raised over the potential criminalisation of freedom of expression.
READ MORE: Andrew Tickell: Ignore the falsehoods, the Hate Crime Act has plenty of safeguards
The author, 58, was joined in attacking the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act, which comes into effect on April 1, by Tesla boss Musk.
The South African-born billionaire criticised the new Scottish laws in response to a post from Malaysian right-wing influencer Ian Miles Cheong.
Cheong had summarised a story in The Herald about training which police are to receive around policing the new bill.
He wrote: “Under the new hate crime law, people who make fun of or misgender trans people, make racial jokes or criticisms of certain religions, or criticize migrants can be prosecuted.
“The different ways in which a person may communicate material to another person are by: displaying, publishing or distributing the material, for example on a sign, on the internet through websites, blogs, podcasts, social media etc., either directly, or by forwarding or repeating material that originates from a third party, through printed media such as magazine publications or leaflets.’”
Cheong added: “Repeat a joke you heard online, or show someone a spicy meme or commentary of a transgender person or mass migration on your livestream, and, and [sic] you too will be arrested.”
Sharing Cheong’s post, Musk wrote: “An example of why it is so important to preserve freedom of speech.”
An example of why it is so important to preserve freedom of speech https://t.co/xcuZLR1VX5
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 19, 2024
Rowling has been highly critical of the new hate crime legislation, arguing the “police are going to be very busy” when it becomes law.
Rowling became embroiled in a misgendering row with trans broadcaster India Willoughby, which saw police in Northumbria clear her of criminality after she stated “India is cosplaying a misogynistic male fantasy of what a woman is”.
And now writing on X, the author responded to messages that she should delete the comments prior to the new Scottish law coming into effect.
Rowling wrote: “If you genuinely imagine I’d delete posts calling a man a man, so as not to be prosecuted under this ludicrous law, stand by for the mother of all April Fools’ jokes.”
The comments seem removed from the author's previous statements. In 2020, she had written: "I respect every trans person’s right to live any way that feels authentic and comfortable to them. I’d march with you if you were discriminated against on the basis of being trans."
Responding to Rowling's more recent comments, Willoughby said the author had “definitely committed a crime”.
She added: “I’m legally a woman. She knows I’m a woman and she calls me a man. It’s a protected characteristic.”
Willoughby also took to social media after the police ruling to state she had received an “avalanche of hate and abuse”, including death threats, adding: “I don’t feel safe.”
Rowling said she had also received a significant amount of “murder and torture” threats.
Rowling has also been a fierce critic of the Scottish Government’s gender reform plans, arguing the proposals would have infringed on women’s safety.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel