THE UK Government has been warned “begging” Israel to let food into Gaza to prevent people being starved will not work.
Foreign Office Minister Andrew Mitchell told MPs on Tuesday that Israel “must do more” to provide land routes for aid.
But the minister, who acts as a deputy for Foreign Secretary Lord Cameron in the Commons, was warned by shadow foreign secretary David Lammy that current levels of aid going into Gaza are “woefully inadequate”, saying the famine was “man-made”.
Conservative former minister Kit Malthouse suggested Israel may be “wilfully obstructing” aid from crossing the border.
He said the UK was “begging, pleading, pressing the Israeli government to allow more aid in, to seemingly little effect”.
Malthouse (above) added: “Now, has [Mitchell] reached the conclusion that the Israeli government is wilfully obstructing the entrance of aid into the Gaza Strip and, if so, that will presumably be a breach of the International Court of Justice’s ruling and indeed international humanitarian law. So what will the consequence be of that conclusion?”
READ MORE: Prestwick Airport 'cuts off Israeli Air Force access' after backlash
Mitchell replied: “I don’t think we are in a position to reach that judgment.”
Answering an urgent question on the situation in Gaza, Mitchell told the Commons: “We are deeply concerned about the growing risk of famine, exacerbated by the spread of disease and of course the terrible psychosocial impacts of the conflict that will be felt for years to come.
“We are totally committed to getting humanitarian aid to all the people in Gaza who desperately need it – either ourselves, or through UN agencies and British or other charities. We and our partners are pushing to get aid in through all feasible means by land, sea and air.”
However, the minister said sea and air deliveries could not “substitute delivery of aid through land routes”.
“There is no doubt that land crossings are the most effective means of getting aid into Gaza, and Israel must do more,” he added.
Labour frontbencher Lammy (above) warned that famine in Gaza is “imminent”, with half the population “expected to face catastrophic levels of hunger, the highest number of people ever recorded under this system”.
He added: “But what distinguishes the horror in Gaza from what has come before is this is not driven by drought or natural disaster – it is man-made.
“It is the consequences of war, it is the consequence of aid that is available not reaching those who need it. Food is piled up in trucks just a few kilometres away, while children in Gaza are starving. It’s unbearable, and it must not go on.”
Lammy added that a planned Israeli offensive in the southern Gaza city of Rafah would risk “catastrophic humanitarian consequences” and called on the Government to work to prevent a further attack.
SNP foreign affairs spokesman Brendan O’Hara issued a similar plea, telling MPs: “The people of Gaza are not starving. The people of Gaza are being starved.”
He claimed that people “just 44 miles from Tel Aviv” are at risk of starvation, is slightly less than the distance between Glasgow and Edinburgh.
Labour backbencher Zarah Sultana said babies in Gaza are so malnourished they do not have the energy to cry.
READ MORE: Israel confirms plans to expand military operation into Rafah
She added: “This isn’t a natural disaster, it isn’t accidental, it is intentional – Israel is using starvation as a weapon of war to collectively punish the Palestinian people. Israel blocks food from entering Gaza while bombing the people trapped inside.”
Mitchell (above) accused the MP for Coventry South of using “florid language”.
Liberal Democrat MP Layla Moran, who has previously spoken of her family in Gaza, urged the Government to change its position and call for an immediate ceasefire.
She said: “What we are doing isn’t working, but there is one more thing we can do, which is to change how we vote at the UN Security Council. Will the UK stop abstaining and join the rest of the world in calling for that immediate ceasefire now?”
Mitchell replied: “The problem with calling for an immediate ceasefire is it may salve our consciences, but it is not deliverable because neither side in this appalling brutality… neither side is willing to embrace a ceasefire.
“That is why the policy of the British Government is to argue in every way we can for a pause, so that we can get the hostages out and get aid in, which can then lead to a sustainable ceasefire.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel