POLICE Scotland’s former chief constable has defended the long-running investigation into SNP finances.
Iain Livingstone has spoken with this week’s Herald on Sunday almost a year on from when the inquiry escalated, with the search of the home of former first minister Nicola Sturgeon and her husband Peter Murrell.
So far, both Sturgeon and Murrell as well as former SNP treasurer Colin Beattie have all been arrested and released without charge.
The operation was first launched in July 2021.
READ MORE: BBC responds to anger at Holocaust text on Kaye Adams show
Livingstone left Police Scotland last August and is now leading Operation Kenovo – a long-running investigation relating to the Troubles in Northern Ireland.
He was pressed on concerns the ongoing investigation is damaging the SNP in the run-up to the next General Election.
“We have always acted in the interests of justice and the rule of law. The political circumstances are around us at all times,” he said.
“I know we have acted with due process. But I have been retired a matter of months now and the matter of Branchform is no longer a matter for me.”
He was further pressed on whether or not a £110,000 campervan at the centre of the investigation should be returned.
The vehicle was towed away by the force last year from outside Sturgeon’s mother-in-law’s house in Dunfermline.
Asked if this should be returned, he said: “I don’t think anything should be happening until there is a decision from the Crown Office.”
Last week, SNP Westminster leader Stephen Flynn (above) joked that the campervan could be given to the Tartan Army for Euro 2024 in Germany.
He also said he still believed comments he made last year when he said, “the sooner Operation Branchform is over the better for everyone”.
“I said the sooner things come to a head for everyone, the better and I still believe that,” he said.
Livingstone also said he would not give advice to his successor Jo Farrell, saying it would be “inappropriate” to do so but that he wanted both her and the force to “do really well”.
READ MORE: Edinburgh: Pro-Palestine campaigners stage demonstration outside Scottish factory
He also rejected criticisms, including from the SNP's chief executive Murray Foote, that the operation had been heavy handed in the search of Sturgeon and Murrell’s home, including the erection of an evidence tent outside the couple’s home.
He said: “I think it was proportionate and necessary, as I said at the time, and I still believe I would have been in neglect of duty had we not acted as we did.”
A Police Scotland spokesperson told The Herald: "As the investigation remains ongoing we are unable to comment."
It is understood that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service has not received a Standard Prosecution Report on Operation Branchform.
A spokesperson for the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service said: “Senior professional prosecutors from COPFS and an Advocate Depute are working with police on this ongoing investigation.
“It is standard practice that any case regarding politicians is dealt with by prosecutors without the involvement of the Law Officers. All Scotland’s prosecutors act independently of political interference.
“As is routine, to protect the integrity of ongoing investigations, we do not comment in detail on their conduct.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel