LAND ownership in Scotland has become more concentrated despite two decades of land reform legislation, according to a new study.
Andy Wightman, a land reform campaigner who previously published data on Scottish land distribution in 2012, has calculated that half of all privately owned rural land in Scotland (equivalent to 3.2m hectares) is held by just 433 people and companies, with only 2.76% held by community groups.
The latest data, as reported by The Guardian, found that hereditary peers own less land than previously, while the number of private investors who specialise in financially lucrative “green capital” schemes to create forestry and peat restoration projects has surged.
Wightman’s (below) analysis of Land Registry records found that Scotland’s third largest landowner is US-owned investment firm Gresham House, which owns 53,775 hectares across 161 separate holdings.
The Duke of Buccleuch – who was Scotland’s largest private landowner when Wightman did his last survey in 2012 – placed second, holding 66,345 hectares.
This figure is 32% less than in 2012, as the estate has been voluntarily selling land to local residents.
READ MORE: Scottish Land Reform Bill introduced to Holyrood
Scotland’s largest landowner is Danish billionaire Anders Povlsen, the largest shareholder in the British online fashion retailer Asos.
He owns 88,296 hectares spread across 12 estates, an increase of 37% since 2012.
Wightman’s data has come from records held by Registers of Scotland, the official land register, and more accurate land mass data from Ordnance Survey.
Alongside other land campaigners, he has argued that the latest data is evidence that the Scottish parliament’s attempts to empower community buyouts to diversify rural landownership has failed, despite enacting several laws to strengthen right to buy laws and asset transfers.
Despite several significant buyouts, including the sale of 4000 hectares on Langholm Moor to local residents by Buccleuch Estates and the purchase of the island of Ulva off Mull, part-funded with £4.4m from the government-backed Scottish Land Fund, sales of that scale are very rare.
‘Scotland has the most concentrated pattern of land ownership in Europe’
Scottish Government figures show the amount of community-owned land has grown by just 40,048 hectares in the last decade, from 172,294 hectares in 2012 to 212,342 hectares.
“Scotland has the most concentrated pattern of land ownership in Europe,” Wightman told The Guardian.
“There’s nothing in the current reforms which will make any substantial change to that. If we’re serious about changing that, we need to embrace reforms which will absolutely deliver.”
READ MORE: Scottish Labour overruled by UK party on WASPI women support
Gresham House, which markets its forestry projects as tax-efficient investments, insists they are ultimately owned by its clients. “Forests managed by Gresham House make a major contribution to Scotland’s rural economy and support hundreds of jobs,” it said.
Mairi Gougeon (above), the Scottish government’s land reform secretary, said the “targeted and proportionate” powers set out in the land reform bill would apply to more than 50% of Scotland.
She continued: “I would like to see us own more of our own land and waters and for that public ownership to be clearly undertaken in the interests of everyone who lives in Scotland. But without the full powers, resources and levers of independence, our ability to do so is limited.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel