THE United Nations Security Council has demanded an "immediate ceasefire" in Gaza.
It is the body's first demand to halt fighting since the bombardment of Gaza began following Hamas' attacks on Israel on October 7.
While the UK voted in favour, the United States abstained on the resolution, which called for a ceasefire during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, which ends on April 9.
The resolution also demanded the release of all hostages taken captive by Hamas.
Because Ramadan ends early next month, the ceasefire demand would last for just two weeks, though the draft says the pause in fighting should lead “to a permanent sustainable ceasefire”.
The vote comes after Russia and China vetoed a US-sponsored resolution on Friday that would have supported “an immediate and sustained ceasefire” in the Israeli-Hamas conflict.
READ MORE: Scott Benton triggers Blackpool by-election as he steps down as MP
The United States warned that the resolution approved on Monday could hurt negotiations – by the US, Egypt and Qatar – to halt hostilities.
The resolution, put forward by the 10 elected council members, is backed by Russia and China and the 22-nation Arab Group at the United Nations.
A statement issued on Friday night by the Arab Group appealed to all 15 council members “to act with unity and urgency” and vote for the resolution “to halt the bloodshed, preserve human lives and avert further human suffering and destruction”.
“It is long past time for a ceasefire,” the Arab Group said.
READ MORE: UK visa rules 'abetting plausible risk of Gaza genocide', expert says
Since the start of the war, the Security Council has adopted two resolutions on the worsening humanitarian situation in Gaza, but none has called for a ceasefire.
The SNP's leader at Westminster, Stephen Flynn, said the UK Government should end all arms sales to Israel in the wake of the UN's decision.
“Imminent famine coupled with the death and injury of 100,000 people appears to have finally forced the UK government to find a backbone and vote for an immediate ceasefire," he said.
"The resolution must now be implemented by applying maximum diplomatic pressure in the pursuit of peace.
“A failure to act now would be unforgivable but the fence-sitting of the US would suggest that Israel may well be free to continue to do as it pleases.
READ MORE: This is why people in Scotland march for Palestinians
“The best way to increase the diplomatic pressure for peace would be to back up our words with actions and immediately end all arms sales to Israel.
"The SNP has remained absolute in our calls for an immediate ceasefire, and are relieved to see most world leaders finally following suit."
More than 32,000 Palestinians in Gaza have been killed during the fighting, according to the Gaza health ministry.
The agency does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count but says women and children make up two-thirds of the dead.
Gaza also faces a dire humanitarian emergency, with a report from an international authority on hunger warning on March 18 that “famine is imminent” in northern Gaza and that escalation of the war could push half of the territory’s 2.3 million people to the brink of starvation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel