LABOUR’S oil and gas tax plans could see the UK "move towards being uninvestable," the offshore energy trade organisation has warned.
Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) has claimed uncertainty over taxation and licensing was scaring firms away from the North Sea, The Herald reports.
Rishi Sunak first announced the Energy Profits Levy – set at 65% - back in May 2022 after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine led to a surge in wholesale and retail energy prices.
He always insisted the windfall tax would be temporary.
However, after Liz Truss’s (below) mini-budget crashed the economy, Jeremy Hunt increased the rate to 75% and extended it for a further two years to March 31, 2028.
In his Spring Budget earlier this month, the Chancellor then pushed the sunset clause back another year to March 2029.
Meanwhile, Labour has promised a “proper windfall tax,” with the existing levy hiked from 75 to 78%.
The party has said it would also close what Rachel Reeves has described as “loopholes” with the current investment allowance which sees oil and gas producers get 91p in tax relief for every £1 they invest scrapped.
Ross Dornan, OEUK's Marketing Intelligence Manager said: “We’ve seen four tax regimes in two years and we’ve seen further changes proposed by Labour aimed at increasing the headline rate of tax and cutting allowances
“I think this would really make the UK move towards being uninvestable, from a number of fronts.”
READ MORE: 'Deeply disappointed': Douglas Ross vows to rebel on windfall tax
In a new report, published today (March 26), OEUK claims there is as much as £450 billion worth of investment in the energy sector, with opportunities lasting until 2040.
Chief executive David Whitehouse said investors need “stability, predictability and fair returns”.
He said: “We are in a global race for investment, and UK energy companies need supportive long-term policies, a stable tax regime, and responsible rhetoric from all sides.
“Our journey to net zero and beyond depends on responsibly making the most of our oil and gas production, which is at record lows.
“We’re facing a situation where we must import energy that could have been produced here and where we must rely on supply chain companies that could have been based here.
“The UK’s world class oil and gas sector has reduced emissions by 24% since 2018 and we must build our low carbon future on this achievement.”
The comments came as Keir Starmer was in Holyhead in Wales to announce a new plan for state-backed offshore windfarms as part of GB Energy.
READ MORE: In graphs - see the key figures behind calls to close the windfall tax loophole
“Floating offshore wind is going to be a gamechanger when it comes to energy,” he told BBC Wales.
“Some country in the world is going to be the leader, and I want that to be the UK. What we can do is have the Westminster government, and the Labour government here in Wales, working on the next generation of energy.”
He said it was part of his party’s plan to “take back control of our national energy security".
However, Russell Borthwick, the chief executive of Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce, said while efforts on renewables should be ramped up there needed to be a recognition that the UK “will also rely on oil and gas for decades to come".
He told The Herald: “It makes no sense to wind down the North Sea prematurely in that context — a point we have made and will continue to stress to all parties ahead of a General Election.
“One way in which the next government could really turbocharge our energy sector and give it the confidence needed to invest in energy transition is to drop the punitive windfall tax on profits and incentivise deployment of renewables and further decarbonisation of existing offshore operations.
“Unfortunately a policy to bleed the North Sea dry will simply displace valuable jobs and new opportunities to other markets across the globe.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel