A MAN who travelled almost 500 miles to stab an elderly widower he had never met has been handed an indefinite hospital order.
James O’Connor killed 89-year-old Frederick Burge as part of a “deluded” belief that he needed to be freed from a curse, a court was told.
The 45-year-old claimed voices told him to kill Burge and Bristol Crown Court heard “auditory hallucinations” led him to travel from Dundee in Scotland to Glastonbury in the south west of England, where he stabbed the pensioner with a kitchen knife nine times on February 26 last year.
Judge Julian Lambert said the defendant’s delusions, caused by schizophrenia, “suggested another person needed to be cut free in order that you might free yourself, and that such a person would be found in Glastonbury”.
The court heard that O’Connor told psychiatrists that the voices picked the house. He then entered Burge’s home and stabbed the pensioner several times in the chest.
READ MORE: Two teens dead after e-bike crash with four cars
The defendant, from Dundee, previously pleaded guilty to manslaughter by diminished responsibility and was sentenced to an indefinite hospital order at Broadmoor Hospital in Berkshire.
Burge, an elderly widower living alone with his dog, was described as a “much-loved family man” who “enjoyed seeing and speaking with his children”.
At O’Connor’s sentencing hearing on Tuesday, Burge’s son and daughter, Kevin and Sylvia, told the court that their family had been left “devastated” by his death.
Kevin’s victim impact statement read: “He was a special person to everyone around him.
“I spoke to him every day and he made me so happy. I cannot describe how devastated I am to know I will never see him or hear his voice again.
READ MORE: Josef Fritzl: Austrian rapist 'wants to move to Scottish Highlands'
“I have nothing but great anger and hatred towards Mr O’Connor.
“My father knew how much he was loved. He has now been reunited with my lovely mother for all time.”
The court heard O’Connor has 16 previous convictions for 30 offences, including drugs, violence and an assault dating back to 1995.
He had suffered from mental difficulties from a young age, including hearing voices and seeing auras.
Judge Lambert said there had been concerns over his mental state while in police custody.
READ MORE: Baltimore bridge collapse: Two pulled from water after bridge hit by cargo ship
The judge added that the defendant had been “preoccupied with God and ‘spiritual things'” and had been observed talking to himself and making “lots of incongruent comments”.
Medical professionals at Broadmoor Hospital identified schizophrenia as the prevailing mental disorder, a condition they said would “substantially impair” his ability to form a rational judgment and to exercise self-control.
In his sentencing remarks, Judge Lambert said: “The effect of what you did is brutal and devastating and has left the family with a graphic image of their father’s demise which no one should have to suffer.
“Given your offending, recent behaviour and your psychiatric condition I can only find that you are dangerous and will be so for a long time.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here