THE regulator of the UK’s oil and gas companies has said that they need to take action to set themselves on a path to reducing emissions and warned it could block developments if they did not take reasonable steps.
The North Sea Transition Authority (NSTA) said that a plan it published on Wednesday highlights “the need for action across the board on production decarbonisation”.
It said that it would work with oil and gas developers, but if they did not take steps it thought necessary it might not approve their applications.
It comes after a committee of MSPs asked the Scottish government for “clarity” over the future of the Just Transition Fund, set up to help the north east refocus its economy on greener alternatives to oil and gas, after its annual funding was cut by 75%.
Despite falls in recent years, the production of oil and gas in the UK contributes around 3% of the UK’s total greenhouse gas emissions. That is not taking into account the emissions produced when that oil and gas is burnt.
READ MORE: Labour's oil and gas plans could make UK 'uninvestable', top energy body warns
This comes partly from the energy that oil rigs and other operations use to transport staff and equipment, pump up oil and much else beside.
But it also comes from practices such as venting or flaring – the process of either releasing unwanted gas into the atmosphere, or burning it on site without utilising the energy that it could produce.
Part of the mission would be to reduce venting and flaring, the latter is especially harmful because it releases methane into the atmosphere, which is a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.
But another way of decarbonising production is to start running oil rigs and other parts of the sector on green electricity.
This could, in the best case, save around one to two million tonnes of carbon in 2030 alone. That is the same as taking around one million cars off the road. By 2050, electrification could have saved a total of 22 million tonnes.
READ MORE: Campaigners question claim UK oil and gas supports 200,000 jobs
The authority warned companies that it might withhold its approval from projects if they are not electrified where it thinks they should be.
“The plan places electrification and low carbon power at the heart of emissions reduction and makes it clear that where the NSTA considers electrification reasonable, but it has not been done, there should be no expectation that the NSTA will approve field development plans and similar decisions that give access to future hydrocarbon resources on that asset,” it said.
The NSTA said that it would “apply the plan in a reasonable manner” and would avoid any unintended consequences.
NSTA chief executive Stuart Payne said: “Energy production, reducing emissions and accelerating the energy transition are at the heart of everything we do.
“The plan strikes the right balance in supporting industry in its work producing the oil and gas which we need and will continue to need in the coming decades, while at the same time playing its role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
“The plan will help to secure the crucial part the North Sea will play in meeting the UK’s energy needs and provide reassurance that the industry can and does place a very high value in cleaning up production and cutting emissions.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel