SCOTTISH Government minister Lorna Slater has written to the UK Government to express “deep concerns” amid suggestions its deposit return scheme (DRS) could be pushed back to 2027 rather than 2025.
She was responding to comments from UK Environment Secretary Steve Barclay, who told MPs this week that the 2027 deadline was “probably more likely”.
The scheme would see consumers recoup a small deposit when they return single-use bottles and cans, having been in development in the Environment Department (Defra) since 2017 and was part of the 2019 Tory manifesto.
READ MORE: Police respond to Scottish Highland beauty spot amid 'woman at cliffs'
The Scottish Government initially designed its own DRS, but its launch was ultimately delayed to 2025 in order to bring it in line with a planned UK-wide scheme.
The Scottish Government blamed Westminster’s refusal to allow glass in the scheme for the delay, accusing the Conservatives of sinking Scotland’s DRS and undermining devolution.
However, the UK Government said the delay was entirely the decision of ministers in Edinburgh, who failed to design the scheme properly.
In her letter to Barclay, Slater (below) said she had “deep concerns”, adding: “Despite our continued requests for Defra to set out its plans for DRS and my recent correspondence dated March 8 on such matters, it is extremely frustrating to hear about details of a further significant delay to the DRS launch from media reports.”
She continued: “As you know, Scotland would now have an operational DRS if the UK Government had not prevented it from moving forward as planned.
“This would have provided a launchpad for wider DRS across the UK meaning we would all be experiencing the environmental and economic benefits much sooner.”
READ MORE: DUP leader Jeffery Donaldson quits as he's charged with historic sex offences
Officials across the four nations are working closely on the UK DRS scheme, she said.
The Scottish Green minister added: “Even though the main premise for undermining Scotland’s scheme was the need for a UK-wide approach, almost one year on, there is no further clarity on the details of your regulations.
“We, the other devolved governments, and businesses now find ourselves facing even greater uncertainty as a result of these latest comments.”
Defra has been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel