THE MSP behind proposed legislation to introduce assisted dying for terminally ill people in Scotland has said he is open to discussions around raising the age limit for it.
Liam McArthur’s Assisted Dying for Terminally Ill Adults (Scotland) Bill was published on Thursday, becoming the third attempt at changing the law on the issue since devolution.
The LibDem MSP has said he is “confident” the Scottish Parliament will back his legislation when it comes to a vote, adding “robust safeguards” are included in the Bill.
Speaking to The Steamie, the politics podcast by The Scotsman newspaper, McArthur was asked if 16 is too young for a terminally ill person to make such a decision.
READ MORE: I'd pray for some of my mum’s titanic pain to be transferred to me
He said: “I think there will need to be a genuine debate around this. I opted for 16 in my bill – age of majority – but I fully expect this to be an area that the lead committee taking evidence will want to scrutinise.
“I’ve had discussions with different stakeholder organisations, including CHAS (Children’s Hospices Across Scotland), who I know have concerns about age limits.
“So I’m open to having those discussions. I need to understand the nature of the concerns and how they might be addressed.”
Changing the law will lead to more “open, regulated and safeguarded discussions around how we die”, he said.
McArthur’s bill would give people over the age of 16 with an advanced terminal illness the option of requesting an assisted death.
They would need to have the mental capacity to make such a request, which would have to be made voluntarily.
Two doctors would have to be satisfied about the patient’s condition, and also that they have not been pressurised into their decision.
Only people who have lived in Scotland for at least a year would be allowed to make such a request, which would be followed by a mandatory 14-day “reflection period”.
Holyrood will likely vote on the general principles of the bill later this year and MSPs are expected to be given a free vote.
However, the leaders of Scotland’s three largest parties – Humza Yousaf, Douglas Ross and Anas Sarwar – have all said they are not currently minded to support the bill.
Opponents of the legislation have said they fear it would see the lives of people who are ill or disabled being “devalued”, with the Bishop of Paisley John Keenan branding it a “dangerous idea”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here