LABOUR have made it “abundantly clear” that voting for them at the next General Election is voting to privatise the NHS, the SNP have said.
It comes after Wes Streeting, Labour’s shadow health secretary, used an article in the Sun to position himself against “middle-class lefties” who oppose his plans to force the NHS to use private sector providers.
Streeting, a key ally of party leader Keir Starmer who has been tipped as a future party leader himself, said the NHS was a “service, not a shrine”.
Streeting’s comments have been widely attacked by parties in Scotland – as well as by the now-independent Diane Abbott MP.
Sharing a story in the Sun about Streeting pledging “major surgery” for the NHS, Abbott wrote: “Wes Streeting has no money to pay NHS doctors and nurses a decent salary. But billions to dish out in private sector contracts.”
READ MORE: 'Racism' row Scottish Labour councillor slammed over asylum seeker comments
The comment was endorsed by Owen Thompson, the SNP’s chief whip at Westminster.
His colleague, the SNP's health spokesperson Amy Callaghan MP said: "Be in no doubt, for as long as Scotland remains under Westminster control, our NHS is under threat.
"Sir Keir Starmer's Labour Party are no longer hiding their desire to privatise the NHS. They have made it abundantly clear: a vote for Labour is a vote for NHS privatisation.
"And instead of offering doctors and nurses a fair wage, Sir Keir Starmer would prioritise handing over billions of pounds to private investors. Their priorities are all wrong.
"In contrast, under the SNP, Scotland's NHS will always remain in public hands.”
Health is devolved, but decisions made by the UK Government have a knock-on impact on funding north of the Border. If Streeting were to bring in more funding for the English NHS, the Scottish Government would receive a portion as “Barnett consequentials”.
Alba Party’s Westminster leader, Neale Hanvey MP, also hit out at Streeting’s (above) privatisation plans.
“It’s now clear that whether Scots end up with a Labour government or a Tory government after the election, a new and devastating privatisation agenda will be front and centre of NHS reforms,” he said.
Hanvey went on: "Back in 2014 this is exactly what supporters of independence warned about. The Labour Party dismissed concerns over NHS privatisation but in order to appeal to Tory voters in the south east of England the Labour Party have now sold-out with their privatisation agenda for the NHS in England, a project started by Tony Blair with his break-up of the NHS into foundation trusts.
“The reality is that Labour have done as much, if not more damage to the NHS than the Tories can be rightly accused of.
“Alba Party are absolutely clear that keeping Scotland's NHS in public hands is the right thing to do, and privatisation is never the answer to addressing the severe pressures much of our NHS is struggling with.”
And Gillian Mackay MSP, the Scottish Greens health spokesperson, said: "Labour is saying the quiet part out loud. The last thing the NHS in England needs is more private-sector involvement. Far too much of it has already been sold off and privatised by successive Labour and Tory governments.
"Unfortunately, this is entirely consistent with Wes Streeting and the UK Labour leadership's approach. The answer here is not a greater private sector influence, it is investment in frontline staff and services.
"With Scottish Greens in government, we will always stand for a publicly owned NHS based on human need and not corporate profits."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel