SCOTTISH Labour have been urged to suspend a candidate who liked and shared "dozens and dozens" of "racist" posts on social media.
Wilma Brown, who is running in the Cowdenbeath and Kirkcaldy constituency, has been accused of spreading “conspiracy nonsense” – including posts claiming that Scottish Government aid to Gaza was going to Hamas, and the debunked viral claim that Humza Yousaf said there are “too many white people in Scotland”.
Last month, Brown also liked a racist post telling an Indian man who was expressing his love for England and its flag “you will NEVER be an Englishman” and “it is not your flag”.
Brown deleted her Twitter/X account after The National reported on the posts.
READ MORE: SNP: Anas Sarwar 'noticeably quiet' on Labour NHS privatisation plans
Now, SNP depute leader Keith Brown has said both Scottish Labour chief Anas Sarwar and Keir Starmer must take action.
"The appalling tweets endorsed by the Labour Party candidate for Cowdenbeath and Kirkcaldy are deeply offensive, racist and completely unacceptable," he said.
"Wilma Brown is clearly unfit to be a candidate at the General Election. Sir Keir Starmer must sack her immediately and explain why she was ever selected given her long and very public history of endorsing deeply offensive comments.
"This is a candidate who Keir Starmer has personally endorsed and visited to campaign alongside. He must explain how this was allowed to happen."
It has also emerged Brown has liked and shared posts suggesting Holyrood should be abolished.
Just days ago, she liked a post by The Majority that featured the hashtag #AbolishHolyrood.
She also liked a tweet from ScotNatWatch in March that said: “Holyrood should be brought under special measures by the British Government. It’s a loose cannon.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel