CAMPAIGNERS are set to seek advice on a possible legal challenge to King Charles’s efforts to remain immune from prosecution under a Welsh law.
A report by The Guardian told how a Buckingham Palace official phoned the Welsh Government to seek assurances the monarch would not be prosecuted under the Agriculture (Wales) Act.
The elected minister who draw up the legislation agreed to a special exemption for the King last year but was reportedly “not happy” about it.
The King was exempted from regulations relating to the marketing of agricultural products, the disposal of carcasses and the disclosure of information to the Welsh state.
According to documents, on June 1 last year the Welsh Government noted in an internal memo that its lawyers “had been contacted by Buckingham Palace officials who have sought an assurance that Welsh ministers will take into account conventions regarding prosecuting the crown when making regulations under this bill”.
READ MORE: We need your support to reach 100,000 signatures for Gaza visa scheme
In an email the following day, Welsh officials noted that Mick Antoniw, the Welsh government’s counsel general was “not happy with the exclusion” but “recognises the ongoing convention and therefore” agreed to it.
This was a reference to an ill-defined convention under which criminal and civil proceedings cannot be brought against the monarch as head of state.
Now anti-monarchy group Republic has said it will be seeking advice on a possible legal challenge to the monarch's immunity.
CEO Graham Smith said the convention “must be tested in court”.
He said: "Either we are all equal in law or none of us are.
"It is an outrage that Charles continues to exploit this outdated convention to ensure he's immune from prosecution.
"Charles should be ashamed of himself for demanding unique protections that allow him to bypass legislation farmers, rural communities and everyone else must abide by.
READ MORE: New Scottish independence poll gives Yes two-point lead
"This convention must be tested in court, it cannot be right that a rule that dates back hundreds of years still protects Charles's private interests and wealth from the law of the land.
"I am seeking legal advice on whether it is possible to challenge this nonsense, and to ensure Charles and all the royals are held to the same standards as everyone else."
According to Buckingham Palace, the royal household rang the Welsh Government to ensure that “as a matter of legal correctness” the monarch could not be prosecuted under the Agriculture (Wales) Act.
A palace spokesperson said the convention had to be maintained as the draft act contained a particular type of legislation that would not rule out the possibility of a prosecution.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel