THE Prime Minister believes it is “wrong” to compare Iran’s attempted attack on Israel with the bombardment of Gaza over the last six months.
Rishi Sunak defended Israel in the Commons on Monday after the Iranian military attempted to bomb the country in retaliation for the attack on its consulate in Damascus, which killed 11 people, including a senior commander in the al-Quds force of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corps, at the start of the month.
The UK diverted Royal Air Force planes from Romania to assist an international coalition which struck down Iranian drones before they were able to land attacks on Israel on Saturday night.
Iran backs anti-Israel groups throughout the Middle East, including Hamas in Palestine, Houthis in Yemen and Hezbollah in Lebanon as well as Shia militias in Iraq.
While Israel has not claimed responsibility for the attack on the Iranian consulate in Damascus on April 1, it is widely expected to have been behind the bombing for which Iran vowed to take revenge.
Speaking after a statement on Britain’s involvement in the conflict in the Commons on Monday, Sunak’s spokesperson said it would be “wrong” to conflate Israel’s right to self-defence – something the UK has stressed despite concern about the scale of their bombardment of Gaza – and Iran’s retaliation against the country.
READ MORE: BBC presenter Nick Robinson puts out lengthy apology after Gaza 'murder' comment
Mhairi Black, the SNP’s deputy Westminster leader, said that Iran’s response was “disproportionate” but that so too was Israel’s response to Hamas’s attack on October 7.
She said: “These acts are no more than a cynical attempt to exploit the suffering, the pain and the turmoil being experienced by those people in Palestine right now.
“Whilst we rightly condemn the violent acts of Iran, so too must we condemn the violent acts of Israel.
“Listening to the interviews that he’s been giving, the Foreign Secretary is correct in his attempt to uphold the principal of proportionality. But if 100 missiles in retaliation to an isolated attack on an embassy is, correctly, constitutes as disproportionate, then so too must Israel’s 192 bombardment of Gaza.”
She said Tehran was intent on bringing about “as much instability as possible” in the Middle East – but said there was “not going to be a military solution to the conflict in the Middle East”.
READ MORE: Israel launches overnight strikes on Gaza amid fears of wider regional war
The MP called for a “political and diplomatic” response, adding: “We need de-escalating and the causes of conflict to be reviewed. Now the biggest continuing cause of conflict is the siege of Gaza, hence the need for a ceasefire.
“So can the Prime Minister outline what he is doing to ensure that the UN Security Council mandated ceasefire becomes a reality?”
Sunak (above) replied: “First of all it’s important not to try and draw any equivalence between Israel’s absolute right, indeed duty to provide security for its citizens in the face of an appalling terrorist atrocity and indeed what happened over the weekend, these things are just not remotely the same.
“More broadly though, as I’ve said repeatedly from this despatch box, urge Israel to abide by international humanitarian law, we’ve been very clear that too many civilians have been killed and we’re deeply concerned about the impact on the civilian population in Gaza and our diplomatic efforts are geared towards alleviating that suffering and I’ll continue to raise these points with prime minister Netanyahu when I speak to him.
“But as I’ve said drawing equivalence between these two things is absolutely the not right thing to do.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel