HUMZA Yousaf has insisted measures to reach net zero will be “accelerated” – despite the Scottish Government axing a key climate target.
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar took the First Minister to task at FMQs after it was revealed that the ambition to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 75% by 2030 had been ditched.
But Yousaf insisted the Scottish Government remained committed to tackling the climate crisis and said Energy Secretary Mairi McAllan would give a statement to Parliament setting out the Government’s next moves later on Thursday.
And he said that Scotland had reduced carbon emissions faster than any other country in the UK.
READ MORE: SNP minister 'disappointed' as Scottish Government 'to ditch key climate pledge'
But Sarwar compared Yousaf with Rishi Sunak, who the First Minister had criticised harshly for rolling back UK net zero targets.
The Scottish Labour leader said: “This SNP-Green government is going to roll back on its climate commitments, so why is Humza Yousaf following the Tories’ lead?”
Yousaf replied that there was “no intention to roll back from that 2045 date” and insisted that deadline for reaching net zero would remain.
He added: “When Mairi McAllan comes to this chamber in the afternoon, we will build upon that by bringing forward an accelerated climate change proposal and plan.”
Sarwar hit back saying that “only Humza Yousaf can believe that slamming the breaks is an acceleration”.
Yosuaf replied: We’re absolutely committed, no rolling back on the net zero by 2045 target – fact.”
He added: “So this afternoon, presiding officer, will be a key test. When the cabinet secretary brings forward an accelerated package of climate proposals it will be time for the opposition to either put up or shut up.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel