THE Scottish Government has issued a response after a report suggested the UK Government could block new misogyny legislation from becoming law.
Humza Yousaf previously confirmed that trans women will be protected under any new misogyny legislation in Scotland.
He said that “anyone affected” by the issue would be covered no matter their biological sex with the Scottish Government aiming to introduce a bill on the matter before the end of the current parliamentary term in 2026.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf reacts after man charged over car incident at Scottish independence rally
However, a report in the Sunday Mail has suggested the UK Government could once again be willing to block Scottish legislation.
A source told the newspaper: “Scottish Secretary Alister Jack (below) has already humiliated the Scottish Government once by kiboshing the GRR bill and he is more than willing to do so again.
“The Conservatives can see SNP gender policy is completely out of step with public opinion and there are also legitimate concerns over whether Scottish legislation on the issue could have a detrimental impact on existing UK law.
“If it is the case that a Scottish misogyny law was going to water down the definition of what a woman actually is to the extent that existing protections for women could be weakened rather than strengthened, then the UK Government will act to block it.”
Jack blocked the Scottish Government’s gender reforms from becoming law by issuing a Section 35 order, despite the legislation being passed by an overwhelming majority of MSPs.
READ MORE: Patrick Harvie speaks out on future of Bute House Agreement
The Scottish Government then went on to lose a court challenge on the grounds the bill would alter the UK-wide Equality Act.
When approached for comment on the story by The National, a spokesperson for the Scottish Government pointed to a review from Baroness Helena Kennedy.
They said: “Baroness Kennedy’s report was clear in recommending that the proposed offences in a Misogyny Bill should apply where the victims are ‘women, or those who perpetrators perceive to be women’.
“This aligns with existing legislation protecting people from abuse that is motivated by prejudice.
“For example, a perpetrator motivated by religious prejudice could be criminalised for threatening a victim because he believes they are Sikh.
“This is based on the perpetrator’s perception – the victim does not have to be Sikh for a crime to have been committed.”
This echoes comments made by Yousaf (below) to the BBC’s Good Morning Scotland programme.
He told the broadcaster: “When a trans woman is walking down the street and a threat of rape is made against them, the man making the threat doesn’t know if they are a trans woman or a cis woman.
“They will make that threat because the perception of that person (is) as a woman.”
The National also approached the Scotland Office for comment and a spokesperson for the UK Government said: “The UK Government considers all Scottish Parliament legislation in the context of the devolution settlement.
“Any legislation on misogyny would be considered in the usual way at the appropriate time.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel