A PROPOSED law to ban protests outside abortion clinics is “necessary” to ensure women are free of intimidation, a Holyrood committee has said.
The Health, Social Care and Sport Committee has unanimously agreed to the general principles of the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Bill proposed by Scottish Green MSP Gillian Mackay.
A report published by the committee on Monday considered the conflicting human rights arguments relevant to the bill, but ultimately concluded they are “proportionate” to the legislation’s aims of ensuring women are able to safely access healthcare.
READ MORE: Scottish Green and SNP members on the future of the Bute House Agreement
Committee MSPs acknowledged the concerns raised by opponents of the legislation who said the proposals threaten their freedom to express their views in public spaces.
MSPs also questioned why the bill proposes a 200-metre safe access zone, instead of the 150m recommended by experts, with the exception of Queen Elizabeth University Hospital in Glasgow which might need the radius extended due to its layout.
During the evidence gathering process, the committee heard concerns that police may find it difficult to determine whether the law has been breached by those undertaking silent prayers.
MSPs also heard from doctors working at facilities offering abortion services, who raised concerns that protests outside premises could result in patients delaying or not accessing treatment, while women who had used the services reported anxiety.
The report states committee MSPs had a “difference of views” over the issue of silent prayers, with some suggesting it should be an explicit exemption to avoid the “criminalisation of private thoughts”.
Meanwhile, others said silent prayers “can still be intimidating” to those seeking abortion services. The committee therefore recommended the issue is discussed further at stage two.
The report went on to state that the legislation’s implementation should be subject to ongoing post-legislative scrutiny to ensure the restrictions remain proportionate.
It will now proceed through the Scottish Parliament to be voted on at stage one.
SNP MSP Clare Haughey (above), committee convener, said: “Our committee is united in backing the Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) Bill.
“We recognise the strong views it has generated and that not all are in favour of its introduction.
“But ultimately we believe the creation of safe access zones around abortion services is necessary to enforce the principle that everyone should be able to access healthcare free from intimidation or harassment.
“We understand there are competing human rights at play, but we have concluded this Bill strikes an appropriate balance.
READ MORE: Tories to keep two-child benefit cap if they win election, says Rishi Sunak
“We held extensive discussions on the issue of silent prayer and while some members felt this should be exempt from the provisions in this Bill, other members felt an exemption would fundamentally undermine its purpose and that silent prayer can be intimidating to those accessing services.
“This will need further consideration if the Bill proceeds to stage two.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here