INVESTMENTS in weapons firms are to be considered “ethical” under newly altered criteria, Rishi Sunak has said.
The Prime Minister announced that private sector investment in arms companies counts towards environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria during a visit to Warsaw in Poland.
Sunak said the world is “the most dangerous it has been” since the end of the Cold War as he promised an extra £75 billion in defence spending by 2030.
During a speech at a military base in Warsaw, Sunak also said the Government will also seek to incentivise companies to invest in weapons by stating that it counts towards ESG criteria – which involves considerations around how a firm manages its impact on people and the planet.
READ MORE: Scotland could be saddled 'with £22bn nuclear clean-up bill' over next century
The Prime Minister said: “To encourage private sector investment into defence production, I can also announce today that we’re going to put beyond doubt that defence investment does count towards environment, social and governance assessments.
“There is nothing more ethical than defending our way of life from those who threaten it.
“Now all of this will put us at the forefront of the global defence industry, allow us to hugely ramp up defence production and give our armed forces the capability they need to keep us safe.”
The comments coincided with a joint statement from the Treasury and the Investment Association, the trade body that represents UK investment managers, declaring that defence investment is “compatible with ESG considerations”.
“Investing in defence companies contributes to our national security, defends the civil liberties we all enjoy, while delivering long-term returns for pensions funds and retail investors,” the online statement said.
“That is why the UK’s world leading investment management industry supports our defence sector, with the Investment Association’s members having invested £35bn in UK defence companies.
“Investing in good, high-quality, well-run defence companies is compatible with ESG considerations as long-term sustainable investment is about helping all sectors and all companies in the economy succeed.”
In recent months, ministers have repeatedly expressed concern over defence firms being excluded from access to capital due to ESG criteria.
Defence Secretary Grant Shapps (above) has spoken out against an investment culture guided by ESG policies that exclude the sector.
In a post on X, formerly Twitter, last year, Shapps said: “It is very wrong for woke fund managers to imagine they’re being principled by de-funding our defence sector due to so-called ethical investment rules.
“In fact, we have a moral imperative to invest in defence because failing to do so would surrender our nation’s protection.”
In September, defence minister Annabel Goldie also said defence firms’ exclusion from access to debt and equity capital “threatens an important part of the economy” and “threatens to increase the cost of procurement, diverting taxpayers’ money away from other defence spending and from public services”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel