THE SCOTTISH Government has announced that a team will be convened to examine the Cass Review recommendations.
The new multi-disciplinary team led by the chief medical officer (CMO) will consider how the report’s 32 clinical recommendations may apply to NHS Scotland and provide an update before Holyrood’s summer recess, which starts on June 29.
Public health minister Jenni Minto delivered a statement in Holyrood on Tuesday after two health boards – NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Lothian – said they would halt the prescription of puberty blockers for new patients.
But Minto faced criticism from opposition MSPs over the “lack of substance” amid accusations the statement was made to appease the Scottish Greens after the party announced it would hold a vote on the future of the Bute House powersharing agreement.
READ MORE: Manufacturing giant to create more than 100 jobs with new Scottish offices
It comes as the Alba Party submitted a motion of no confidence in Greens co-leader Patrick Harvie after he refused to say whether he accepted the findings of the review.
In her statement, Minto said the Scottish Government was taking time to consider the findings of the Cass Review and whether they were “relevant” to Scottish gender identity healthcare.
She said her statement was being used to address the families directly impacted by the pause in puberty blockers.
Addressing trans and non-binary young people, she said: “I know these last few weeks and months have been incredibly difficult with increased media attention and toxic online commentary.
“I understand how shocking, upsetting and destabilising the announcements last week, and the public conversations around them will have been for you and your families.
“I want to reassure you that the Scottish Government remains absolutely committed, not just to ensuring ongoing support is available for you, but to reforming and improving gender identity healthcare.
“This was a key part of the Bute House Agreement and we will not waver in that commitment.”
She also said it was “absolutely correct” that NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde and NHS Lothian notified patients instead of the Scottish Government announcing a pause.
However, Scottish Tory deputy leader Meghan Gallacher (below) said the statement would “offer no comfort whatsoever to families who have been failed by gender care services in Scotland”.
She criticised the Scottish Government’s handling of the issue after repeated attempts for a ministerial comment on the review was rejected last week.
Scottish Labour deputy leader Jackie Baillie criticised the statement’s “lack of substance” as she accused Minto of making a “sop to the Greens to keep the Bute House Agreement alive”.
She asked the public health minister to clarify whether she agreed with Patrick Harvie when he said the report wasn’t a “valid scientific document”.
In her statement, Minto also said the Scottish Government will “not waver” in its commitment to improving gender identity healthcare.
“We are absolutely committed to investing £9 million to support the improvement of NHS gender identity healthcare in Scotland,” she said.
“As part of this commitment, since December 2022, we have invested over £2.8m to support work to improve access to gender identity healthcare in Scotland, with over £2.2m of that allocated directly to Health Boards with gender identity clinics.
“Now we will invest a further £2m, as a part of our £9m commitment, this year and a further £2m in each of the next two years and we are committed to long term sustainable funding for these services beyond that point.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel