The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) is facing backlash after it emerged thousands of people who care for others are being regularly overpaid and then receiving demands for repayment months or years later.
Calls for the DWP to launch a review into the way it handles Carer’s Allowance are growing louder, as a UK Government dementia adviser resigned over the “beyond the pale” prosecutions of carers who had unwittingly gone above the £151 per week earnings threshold.
New figures have revealed that an estimated 34,500 people were overpaid last year, an increase of 4000 from last year.
While more than 1000 of those people have been ordered to pay back sums between £5000 and £20,000, the Guardian is reporting.
Any carer who earns more than the £151 per week limit is expected to pay back their Carer’s Allowance benefit for that week, though many claimants say the rules are unclear.
Johnny Timpson, a government adviser who resigned this week over the matter, told the Guardian: “The fact that we have made absolutely no progress at all on social care [and] we really did not support carers adequately during the pandemic.
“But this latest thing – the approach the DWP are taking to reclaim benefits from carers and people with disabilities, particularly with neurological disabilities – is beyond the pale for me really.”
Iain Duncan Smith, a former Tory work and pensions secretary, has called on the DWP to delay the overpayment claim process.
He told the Guardian: “The best thing is for the DWP now to pause any of these demands, review carefully what was behind all of this to make sure this was not mistakes by DWP but is genuinely about individuals failing to notify the department.”
A DWP spokesman said: “Carers across the UK are unsung heroes who make a huge difference to someone else’s life and we have increased carer’s allowance by almost £1500 since 2010.
“Our most recent statistics show that carer’s allowance overpayments relating to earnings represents 2.1 per cent of the £3.3bn we spend supporting those who look after loved ones.
“Claimants have a responsibility to inform DWP of any changes in their circumstances that could impact their award, and with safeguards in place to manage repayments, this ensures fairness in our welfare system.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel