What covering the end of the Green SNP deal was like as a National journalist

To use Humza Yousaf's exact words, the deal was "terminated” with “immediate effect”. Ouch.

It wasn’t too long ago that Yousaf told The National that the SNP’s coalition with the Scottish Greens was “worth its weight in gold”. Now, the deal has reached its “natural conclusion”.

This rather dramatic shift in language was the centre of attention at today’s press conference, with journalists intent on determining Yousaf’s future as leader of the SNP.

When I arrived, I got a good sense of how the day would play out as journalists were imagining the scene which must have played out only an hour earlier between Yousaf and the Scottish Greens co-leaders.

“Watch out for any broken plates that might have been chucked out of the window,” one person joked.

READ MORE: Tories to force no-confidence vote in Humza Yousaf after SNP-Green deal ends

As a journalist, it can be exciting to report on news like this. There’s a certain thrill to hearing what party insiders have to say, to speculating about how the “divorce” – as one journalist put it – had really gone down.

The First Minister also leaned into these jokes. When asked if it was better to break up a relationship than be the one broken up with, he replied: “I wouldn’t know.”

Yet the comedy act ended here, as it became clear that everyone in that room was interested in finding out only one thing: Would Yousaf be stepping down as First Minister?

Journalists took turns to ask what was essentially the same question, worded in a slightly different way with various dramatic iterations of “hopeless” and “useless” flung around.

And each time, Yousaf would respond with the same answer, arguing that his decision to end the agreement showed his ability to lead.

Don’t get me wrong, I understand the importance of determining Yousaf’s future as First Minister – but they’re missing the point by playing verbal ping-pong.

READ MORE: Ensure there's a pro-independence voice in Scotland's media - for just £20

Everyone seemed fixated on finding the next headline, without considering what the end of the Bute House Agreement actually means for people living in Scotland.

Press conferences are quite literally where news is made, and the room was filled with journalists who get to decide how that news is conveyed to the public. It’s both an enormous privilege and a huge responsibility to be there – so why were they all asking him the same question?

All I could think about was how Yousaf’s decisions – and the way in which journalists report on them – have very real consequences for people in Scotland, particularly those who want independence and who trusted the SNP to deliver that.

So, I didn’t ask him why he hasn’t resigned yet. Instead, I asked him how losing a pro-independence majority government would impact the independence movement.

Yousaf remained defiant, telling me that despite being a minority government, support for independence remained at its highest in Holyrood.

I left the press conference with the impression that the SNP are confused about the direction they need to take if they want to succeed electorally.

In ditching the Bute House Agreement, the party could have lost a huge amount of support from both Scottish Green and SNP members.

And of course, with the no-confidence vote now hanging over him, the FM's intervention didn't quite shore up his position in the way he may have expected.

The coming weeks and days will be very interesting indeed. But from speaking to journalists today, it seems that most of them have already reached a conclusion about Yousaf’s future as First Minister.